That was sarcasm.. because what you said they should say was pretty much exactly what they did say.
- - - Updated - - -
And that's the problem, you have a bunch of people having a kneejerk reaction thinking that the actions of one employee constitutes a message from the company. Now if the video had Sitka's logo all over it and was an official announcement then eff 'em but it wasn't. It was some rando saying something stupid.
Now we have a bunch of snowflakes backtracking and doing the typical liberal mental gymnastics BS talking about how Sitka must approve of it because they would have vetted him and since he has X amount of social media followers that must constitute an endorsement from the company blah blah blah.
The simple fact of the matter is it feels so much better for yall to be morally outraged at a big company than some rando who happens to work there (assuming he still works there, which the only evidence we have points to him not working there) that you will go through all sorts of mental gymnastics and justifications to hold on to that outrage.
It's shameful behavior from a group who really should know better.