It’s obvious you are going to have a comment on most anything posted. To that, I’ll say reread what I said originally. To clarify, As of late, meaning the previous president, the high court seems to lean constitutional on 2A cases. And, if given an opportunity to be heard, in the right audience, I’m guessing those bans go away.
Read their writing. Read the historical record of the debates. Understand the principles that formed the government. Study history my friend. It’s not all quantitative.
Whose writing? Most of what people quote is from authors and intellectuals from the time period of 1750-1820 and very little from any of the founders.
You’re applying a 19th century and later standard to an 18th century event. List the 18th century constitutional republics that prohibited slavery at the time. Was slavery banned in the monarchy they revolted from? Context matters.
Nope they just kicked back a bunch of 2A cases to lower district courts. Meaningful cases that could establish precedent on magazine capacity, make/MFG features et el.
I'm not one to pick the lesser of two evils.
I agree. All we can do is hope that changes. And refuse to comply until it does.
OK — how were these wealthy elitists not a slave-owning ruling class, then?
You're assuming that none of these people have health coverage already. I'm a Gulf War veteran with several different unexplained conditions that appeared after that. But I would never rely solely on the VA to provide my healthcare. In fact, I've never used VA healthcare.
I'm not assuming I work with these vets single every day.
Run for office, you'd get my vote.
We are in this position because of compromise, they are destroying the greatest nation to ever exist because spineless politicians won’t stand up for the values that this country was founded on.
