Golden is Boulder adjacent (which went from classic liberal, IE you do you, to super lefty we want to control you), the rest of Colorado is not THAT bad even on the front range. Keep in mind the gathers are either rabid fans of the measure or literally paid players so I wouldn’t directly associate their lies and circus with the overall people.
Thanks for your support. We need it for sure in Colorado, but the fact of the matter is that these types of initiatives are going to become even more common nationally if we lose this one here. It’s important to remember the wolf initiative passed by +/- 1% of the vote. That one caught us sleeping. That said, there has been a lot of effort put into educating the general public about big cat management in Colorado and the role hunting in general plays in game population mgmt of all kinds. And, anecdotally, I’ve talked to a fair share of people who voted for the wolf initiative who would recant if they could. The problems and issues raised by it were an unexpected outcome. So we’re talking about a couple percentage points swing to be successful; which indicates to me that the state still has a fair share of reasonable thinking voters.
True….. it’s called ‘confirmation bias’
raffles.scicolorado.org
SCI Colorado Raffles | SCI Colorado Raffles
This whole article gave me as my son would say "brain rot".
This is hilarious! "to ensure that public resources are not used for political purposes".
Why are the "For" arguments emotional and non-factual? "Pain and trauma" really??? Also, mountain lions can regulate themselves...until they can't and we have to kill them. Haha. Fur trade? Sorry I don't know anyone hunting mtn lions for the fur trade, if thats even legal. Bobcats maybe, but that is such a small niche thing. No mention of people eating the meat.
Co resident. Interesting write up on prop 127 from the book they pre-send us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The whole CO blue book is written that way. It's disgusting.
savethehuntcolorado.com
Not so fast I guess. Sounds like the editorial board has issued an apology to the local Durango groups supporting 127. Don’t be surprised if they recant their stated position and now support 127.
