Ballot Initiative to neutralize CPW and eliminate hunting/fishing in Colorado

Doing some more digging, it seems like the main culprit behind all of these movements is Samantha Miller, a California native (or at least went to college there) and Grand Lake resident who has bounced around a number of non-profits who’s main objectives are to end hunting. She helped stopped the WA spring bear hunt in ‘23, was the campaign manager for Prop 127 in CO, and seems to be the founder or founding member of the new Colorado Wildlife Alliance. Go figure.
You nailed it. Samantha Miller was the executive director for Washington Wildlife First, where she helped end the spring bear hunt and fill the wildlife commission with anti-hunting activists. Causing the current dysfunction. Then she moved to Colorado to launch Prop 127. She was also serving as campaign manager for Animal Wellness Action/Center for Humane Economy, a national anti-hunting org ran out of DC by disgraced former Humane Society CEO Wayne Pacelle. They were the major donor funding Prop 127. Julie Marshall is the other major player, she also led CATS with Miller and was a paid employee of AWA/CHE and Pacelle. She is at most every CPW commission meeting, a Boulder journalist heavily involved in anti-hunting movement. The other major player is Mark Surls, photographer from the Denver/Boulder area. He was organizer for CATS and co-hosts Podcast “Wildlife Wire” with Miller. The strategy is clear, move into a decidedly blue state with a major urban population center, set up a state-level anti-hunting organization under the auspices of “wildlife protection”, and gather up all the people who hate hunters. Then flood the commission, legislature, and ballot box with anti-hunting petitions, proposals, and bills.
 
You nailed it. Samantha Miller was the executive director for Washington Wildlife First, where she helped end the spring bear hunt and fill the wildlife commission with anti-hunting activists. Causing the current dysfunction. Then she moved to Colorado to launch Prop 127. She was also serving as campaign manager for Animal Wellness Action/Center for Humane Economy, a national anti-hunting org ran out of DC by disgraced former Humane Society CEO Wayne Pacelle. They were the major donor funding Prop 127. Julie Marshall is the other major player, she also led CATS with Miller and was a paid employee of AWA/CHE and Pacelle. She is at most every CPW commission meeting, a Boulder journalist heavily involved in anti-hunting movement. The other major player is Mark Surls, photographer from the Denver/Boulder area. He was organizer for CATS and co-hosts Podcast “Wildlife Wire” with Miller. The strategy is clear, move into a decidedly blue state with a major urban population center, set up a state-level anti-hunting organization under the auspices of “wildlife protection”, and gather up all the people who hate hunters. Then flood the commission, legislature, and ballot box with anti-hunting petitions, proposals, and bills.

Absolutely insane to me that people make entire careers out of ruining things for people who just want to enjoy hunting and be left alone in the outdoors.
 
I was wondering about this the other day. Why did they back off their crusade in CA and are trying to go further in CO with their efforts? CA has takes some hard blows but they haven't eradicated hunting there.
That’s a great question. I think they believe the political environment favors them more in Colorado, particularly the Governor’s office with the First Gentlemen being a very vocal animal rights activist. The General Assembly not so much, but recent appointments to the CPW Commission also created some opportunity to push anti-hunting measures or “rewilding”. Some likely thought Prop 114: Wolf-reintroduction created momentum to push more aggressive action. That didn’t really pan out with Prop 127 though. Another factor has been the growth in anti-hunting NGOs in Colorado; CATS, Colorado Wildlife Alliance, Anti-Hunting Policy Center at CSU, etc.
 
That’s a great question. I think they believe the political environment favors them more in Colorado, particularly the Governor’s office with the First Gentlemen being a very vocal animal rights activist. The General Assembly not so much, but recent appointments to the CPW Commission also created some opportunity to push anti-hunting measures or “rewilding”. Some likely thought Prop 114: Wolf-reintroduction created momentum to push more aggressive action. That didn’t really pan out with Prop 127 though. Another factor has been the growth in anti-hunting NGOs in Colorado; CATS, Colorado Wildlife Alliance, Anti-Hunting Policy Center at CSU, etc.
Man that's saying something if they moved focus from Cali to CO thinking they can get more traction than in Cali.
 
“In the event CPW or another relevant agency is defunded or dissolved, the WECC shall assume all wildlife management responsibilities previously assigned to those agencies, ensuring uninterrupted conservation efforts.”

This may be meaningless, but I doubt it. Nothing they do is by accident. From the reading on this, they are putting chess pieces in place for an effort to defund or do away with CPW. Even if it dissolves to rebrand or set up new organizational structure, it looks like this group would take control. The language also gives them the power to list certain species as endangered and “reintroduce” species. Poor Colorado. These people are committed to lunacy.
 
I will always fight the good fight, but in reality, I think CO is doomed. This shit will never end with the people that live on the front range.
It’s discouraging… yet we gave them a big L last year I think about how discouraged they are? Likely spent 3-5 million on what they thought was a sure thing and lost BIGLY! We can hang in there, my theory is if we give up and they “win” here then they can focus all their energy at Arizona or Nevada or Michigan… when we put up an effective defense here it forces them to spend and spread resources out. I know it’s tough but we can’t be all doom and gloom. Gotta keep it up
 
It’s discouraging… yet we gave them a big L last year I think about how discouraged they are? Likely spent 3-5 million on what they thought was a sure thing and lost BIGLY! We can hang in there, my theory is if we give up and they “win” here then they can focus all their energy at Arizona or Nevada or Michigan… when we put up an effective defense here it forces them to spend and spread resources out. I know it’s tough but we can’t be all doom and gloom. Gotta keep it up
I agree it is not all doom and gloom. Colorado hunters are much more organized now. We have groups in place to advocate for hunters. We just have to stay vigilant and keep showing up, especially at commission meetings and the legislature. These anti-hunters arent going away but we have the momentum.
 
With every wolf that dies (3 so far this year alone), I think (at least hope) the average voter realizes what an abject failure that program was and that wildlife management should be left to the experts. There will always be these lunatics, hunters and outdoorsman need to continue to appeal to those in the middle who are largely reasonable people and make up the majority of the voting population.
 
Back
Top