woods89
WKR
I'd definitely agree with some of this. And yes, my kids will have the opportunity to hunt, and if I meet someone who shows an honest interest I'll probably help them along, although I certainly won't deprive them of the fun of making their own mistakes."How many" depends on your goal. Hunting is already unsustainable in many areas and has been for a long time. Point creep has been around since before social media. For a majority of Americans it is not realistic to only consume wild game meat unless they want a mostly vegetarian lifestyle. Pretending that the influx of hunters in the last few years has changed that is just not realistic. The gains to be made with adding 5% of the population would be that every one of those people has a family, has co-workers, has friends. And they can shed a positive light on hunting to those people. They can discuss legislation regarding hunting with people who would have otherwise just assumed hunting is bad. I'm not here to say "we need more hunters!" But I am saying that more people having a positive view of hunting is a good thing. If your goal if for you to never have someone in your hunting spot or to always get the tag you want. Then your goal is a lot less hunters. More pressure means stricter control on tags to reduce the effects on the resource. Yes, that is an unfortunate consequence of hunting growing in popularity . Personally, I wish there were less hunters AND more support of hunting by the public. That just isn't realistic. And who am I to be the gatekeeper and say someone else shouldn't be hunting?
But I'll have to admit, I don't see much upside to the way it's being promoted on social media, other than making some people money.