- Banned
- #341
It is relevant, you act as though Wyoming is the only state in the US that is eligible to apply for federal grants.Not sure how this is even relevant to the topic? Are you saying the feds made Wyoming design subpar roads with no wildlife passage in return for federal funding?
Recall that this started when You said that the only federal aid Wyoming receives for wildlife is Pittman Robertson and dingell Johnson funding.
I called BS in that erroneous claim and posted just one example where Wyoming DOT received $14 million in federal aid to help them install new wildlife crossings in the States roads.
In your shock gobble reaction, without even thinking it through, you said something to the effect that the passage should have been designed into the roads in the first place and it was the feds that ‘screwed it up’
I then simply pointed out the fact that most roads in Wyoming are not owned, designed or managed by the feds at all… instead they are owned and operated by the citizens of Wyoming.
In many cases, when IH were constructed there was no federal funding for wildlife crossings, so yes, it was a huge mistake. Much cheaper for the taxpayer to install things like that during initial construction than after. Seems short sighted by the feds, who fund this type of thing in all 50 states.
Intuitively obvious, even to a casual observer.
Do you have a relevant point?