Lobbying Wyoming game and fish negatively affecting non-resident elk hunters

The tags currently are very limited. There is a lot of focus on how to get the sheep going again. My understanding is when the population does start to do good it expands. When it bumps up to domestic sheep the herd is exposed to disease which can spread rapidly through the population with a high mortality rate. It's really a while other can of worms. The same is true for moose populations. I'm sure someone smarter than me can list the reasons, but the bottom line is the populations are not thriving in the way they were expected to when the point system was put in place. There was a realization that the current model for tag allocation is broken and needs addressed.

I really do appreciate that people are upset that the oppertunity they thought was there is being reduced, but the allocation system was broke and the best time to fix it is today, not in five years when it's even more upside down.
And I think most would of fully understood if it was just a reducing overall tags, the one positive I see is making these OIL.
 
Males are not the limiting factor in a population. Removing one male makes room for one more female.

The game and fish also probably realizes what has been shown so many times on this thread, if a portion of the population doesn't get to shoot at it they don't care about it.
 
And I think most would of fully understood if it was just a reducing overall tags, the one positive I see is making these OIL.
They have been reducing ram tags as needed as well.

When I had my tag I saw more than 100 rams that were 3/4 curl or better in the 26 days I hunted, good numbers of young rams too. Lots of ewes and lamb numbers were pretty solid.

They issued 20 ram tags for that area.

The GF also takes photos, plugs, and ages every single ram taken. If they see the average ages starting to decline, they usually back off on tag numbers.
 
How effective have the efforts been to keep domestic sheep away from wild sheep?
Depends on the specific herds, but generally pretty good. There is one specific landowner that is a problem in one area.

Units I worry about are 17, 19 but those are doing really well.
 
What part of, "If it was deleted its not going to be found" is confusing? Your strawman argument of "Nothing is ever deleted on the internet" is a little ridiculous. Post something on here, delete it, then try to find it for me. I'll wait.
lol... you don't know what strawman means, do you?

Sent from my SM-G998U1 using Tapatalk
 
Just a really quick glance at the NR draw odds. It looks like 37 tags were issued, max points was 26 and there were about 1400 people in the 22 point pool. So your looking at around 37 years just to chew through the 22 point holders. I'm sure I got something wrong please feel free to point it out if I did.

Like I said, the system is broken and is not sustainable. Tell me how 90/10 has cheated the guy with 10 points?
 
Is there any type of buffer zone for wild herds vs domestic grazing permits? Sanctions for people violating buffers?
No sanctions that I'm aware of, there is an incredible amount of collaboration with the domestic sheep industry to keep them separated.

There is one really bad actor in Wyoming that is impossible to deal with.

 
Is there any type of buffer zone for wild herds vs domestic grazing permits? Sanctions for people violating buffers?

Not really. There was a case a few years ago about a rancher intentionally running sheep up against a heard in retaliation for not getting his wildlife damages he wanted from the state.

The big horns are wild animals an start to spread out as the population grows. That's when they get into to trouble.
 
It is tough to figure out what are the correct and wrong answers for WY hunter management. I wish the game and fish, residents and non residents the best of luck in the upcoming draw.
 
Back
Top