Who else hunts the west with a black rifle?

Taudisio

WKR
Joined
Jan 20, 2023
Messages
888
Location
Oregon
So, all the normal parts of an AR, minus the gas block/gas tube? No other changes to the action?
Starting from the front of the rifle, NO- gas port, gas block, gas tube, bolt stop/release, buffer retainer, buffer, buffer spring.

The buffer tube is completely empty and could be a folder if I decided. The bolt carrier is chopped in half, so it doesn’t even go into the tube. There is no gas system in the gun.
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
2,973
Those gasless AR’s are super cool.

I’m not an AR fan, but put hem together for the kids - no self respecting young dude would be without one. Now that AR10 components have come way down in price, I will probably end up building an accurate 6.5 creed or 7mm08 for one of them to hunt with.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
798
Location
Lyon County, NV
Starting from the front of the rifle, NO- gas port, gas block, gas tube, bolt stop/release, buffer retainer, buffer, buffer spring.

The buffer tube is completely empty and could be a folder if I decided. The bolt carrier is chopped in half, so it doesn’t even go into the tube. There is no gas system in the gun.

Without the buffer/spring, how is the BCG going forward, after you pull it back? Do you have it fixed to the charging handle somehow?
 

Taudisio

WKR
Joined
Jan 20, 2023
Messages
888
Location
Oregon
Without the buffer/spring, how is the BCG going forward, after you pull it back? Do you have it fixed to the charging handle somehow?
It has a left side charging handle, fire, pull back and eject, push forward and it loads a new round from the magazine. Just like a bolt action, except you don’t have to lift up. I don’t have a video in action, but I have some where you can hear me working the bolt.

 
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
798
Location
Lyon County, NV
It has a left side charging handle, fire, pull back and eject, push forward and it loads a new round from the magazine. Just like a bolt action, except you don’t have to lift up. I don’t have a video in action, but I have some where you can hear me working the bolt.


Ah, that makes total sense now. Thought you were using a normal charging handle. Very cool setup man.
 

Taudisio

WKR
Joined
Jan 20, 2023
Messages
888
Location
Oregon
Ah, that makes total sense now. Thought you were using a normal charging handle. Very cool setup man.
It wasn’t my idea, just my tweaks on the original design.
 

11boo

WKR
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
2,459
Location
Grand Jct, CO
It wasn’t my idea, just my tweaks on the original design.
I remember that thread, pretty great ideas in there. Does the bolt ever unlock itself when fired? Seems unlikely.

I’m definitely going to use the sfar for my cow tag, if I can go.

I weighed this old .308 dpms once. The scope/rings are steel IOR stuff. Heavy.
That gun weighed 11 lbs loaded. I lost 1.2 lbs going with a lighter 1x4 and Al mount.
IMG_0373.jpeg
 

Taudisio

WKR
Joined
Jan 20, 2023
Messages
888
Location
Oregon
I remember that thread, pretty great ideas in there. Does the bolt ever unlock itself when fired? Seems unlikely.

I’m definitely going to use the sfar for my cow tag, if I can go.

I weighed this old .308 dpms once. The scope/rings are steel IOR stuff. Heavy.
That gun weighed 11 lbs loaded. I lost 1.2 lbs going with a lighter 1x4 and Al mount.
View attachment 774933
It hasn’t unlocked yet, and I have probably around 25 miles packing it around between both bear seasons and this last week of deer season. I run my reloads on the longer and hotter end of what is possible, so sometimes I have to give it more beans while closing the bolt, but my 5.56 version doesn’t have that problem. No issues with the bolt coming open, or hard time ejecting (since I backed it down a few tenths of a grain).
 

Thegman

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
625
I remember that thread, pretty great ideas in there. Does the bolt ever unlock itself when fired? Seems unlikely.

I’m definitely going to use the sfar for my cow tag, if I can go.

I weighed this old .308 dpms once. The scope/rings are steel IOR stuff. Heavy.
That gun weighed 11 lbs loaded. I lost 1.2 lbs going with a lighter 1x4 and Al mount.
View attachment 774933
The bolts stay completely locked upon firing until you pull back the charging handle. There are no gas system forces driving the bolt carrier, so it doesn't move until you move it.

The bolt -can- get bumped open while carrying in certain situations, especially rough country, but like Taudisio said, not generally an issue. When I'm packing up a mountain, my rifle is slung on the right side of my pack frame. I do check the bolt periodically to make sure it's not bumped open. Not something I've seen for a while, but a habit I've developed.
 

Rotnguns

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Apr 11, 2020
Messages
281
Location
Southwest Idaho
I think you make compelling points. However, if I had a 300 yard shot at an elk (longest shot I would take with my confidence level) I would prefer my .308 over either the 6.5 GR or the 6 ARC. Not to say either of those rounds wouldn't do the job, but the .308 has considerably more momentum and kinetic energy at that range. Of course, that means a heavier AR 10 platform, so there is that....
To clarify, because mechanical engineers like this sort of thing:

Translational Kinetic Energy = ½ mass * (velocity squared), where mass and velocity units are slugs and ft/sec, respectively. KE will be returned in units of ft-lb.

Linear Momentum = Mass*Velocity , where mass is in slugs and velocity is in ft/sec. Linear Momentum will be in units of slug-ft/sec .

Comparing a few factory loads from Hornady:

For the .308 with 178 grain eld-x, at 300 yards: 2145 ft/sec, 1818 ft-lb, 1.69 slug-ft/sec

For the 6.5 GR with 123 gr sst, at 300 yards: 2090 ft/sec, 1193 ft-lb, 1.14 slug-ft/sec

For the 6 ARC with 105 gr boat tail hollow point, at 300 yards: 2260 ft/sec, 1190 ft-lb, 1.05 slug-ft/sec.



Compared to the 6.5 GR, the .308 has 52% more KE and 48% more linear momentum at 300 yards.

Compared to the 6 ARC, the .308 has 53% more KE and 61% more linear momentum at 300 yards.
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
9,610
To clarify, because mechanical engineers like this sort of thing:

Translational Kinetic Energy = ½ mass * (velocity squared), where mass and velocity units are slugs and ft/sec, respectively. KE will be returned in units of ft-lb.

Linear Momentum = Mass*Velocity , where mass is in slugs and velocity is in ft/sec. Linear Momentum will be in units of slug-ft/sec .

Comparing a few factory loads from Hornady:

For the .308 with 178 grain eld-x, at 300 yards: 2145 ft/sec, 1818 ft-lb, 1.69 slug-ft/sec

For the 6.5 GR with 123 gr sst, at 300 yards: 2090 ft/sec, 1193 ft-lb, 1.14 slug-ft/sec

For the 6 ARC with 105 gr boat tail hollow point, at 300 yards: 2260 ft/sec, 1190 ft-lb, 1.05 slug-ft/sec.



Compared to the 6.5 GR, the .308 has 52% more KE and 48% more linear momentum at 300 yards.

Compared to the 6 ARC, the .308 has 53% more KE and 61% more linear momentum at 300 yards.


And none of that tells you anything about how much tissue will be damaged, or how well any of them will kill.
 
Top