gelton
WKR
Since you like nicknames so much, how about Comrade Trump? Helped into office by Russian intelligence, and preparing to sell off your birthright to multi-national oil interests.
Sent using Tapatalk
"helped into office by Russian Intelligence" - "Preparing to sell your birthright to multinational oil interests" Could we get some sources here? Or are you relying on the Washington Posts article who says it is an assumption but there is no clear evidence. Or are you believing the alphabet agency that told us Saddam Hussain had WMD's and had ties to 911, that says there is a "consensus" but provides no evidence?
Did you read the emails released by WikiLeaks? And if you have, did you decide that the content of the emails weren't important but how they got released WAS?
Keep voting democrat and see how far that gets you. I thought for sure Colorado sportsmen and gun owners would have learned something by now. How is that mag limit working out for ya?
From the WaPo just last week - "The Washington Post on Nov. 24 published a story on the work of four sets of researchers who have examined what they say are Russian propaganda efforts to undermine American democracy and interests. One of them was PropOrNot, a group that insists on public anonymity, which issued a report identifying more than 200 websites that, in its view, wittingly or unwittingly published or echoed Russian propaganda. A number of those sites have objected to being included on PropOrNot’s list, and some of the sites, as well as others not on the list, have publicly challenged the group’s methodology and conclusions. The Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings regarding any individual media outlet, nor did the article purport to do so. Since publication of The Post’s story, PropOrNot has removed some sites from its list."
"And then the summary:
1. Announce "consensus" (not unanimous) "conclusion" based in circumstantial evidence now, before the Electoral College vote, then write a report with actual details due by Jan 20.
2. Put a proven liar in charge of writing the report on Russian hacking.
3. Fail to mention that not one of the leaked DNC or Podesta emails has been shown to be inauthentic. So the supposed Russian hacking simply revealed truth about Hillary, DNC, and MSM collusion and corruption.
4. Fail to mention that if hacking was done by or for US government to stop Hillary, blaming the Russians would be the most likely disinformation used by US agencies.
5. Expect every pro-Hillary lapdog journalist - which is virtually all of them - in America will hyperventilate (Twitter is currently on fire) about this latest fact-free, anti-Trump political stunt for the next nine days."
Last edited: