camelcluch
WKR
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
I had WPs and love them at first. Then they got very loud and the traction was horrible. I started to notice the decline at about 40% wear. The price super good at the time but I won’t get another set.
I'm also in the minority here, but I had KO2s on my silverado and loved them, got 90k+ on them, and then needed to see what all the buzz was about with the Wildpeaks so I got those.. they are quieter and I haven't really put the traction to the test to know how they compare, but they now have 33k on them and are wearing pretty decent, but definitely not as much tread as the KO2, and my truck just started shaking at interstate speeds and I took it in thinking it was time for a u-joint, and turns out the tires need to be rebalanced.. shop owner told me he hasn't been nearly as impressed with the Falkens as he used to be. I kinda want to go back to KO2s for my next set.
the ko2's losing traction on wet roads with wear has been much more of a small (light) pickup thing, on heavier rigs they seem to maintain good traction... kind of a common thing on small pickups with aggressive tires... toyo MT's being the very worst of all, i hate those tires on light rigs.... i have a set of ko2's on our tundra and my colorado zr2, and they are pretty easy to break lose on my pickup on wet roads, the tundra has about 45k on it, and original ko2's, and it still does pretty well traction wise... mine have about 25k and i may switch them prior to archery season, but i rarely get over a year out of tires, so no disappointment there for me... i won't be getting them again though, i'm going with the falken MT's or the newer hancook MT's this time.... the one time i found a tire i wanted to stick with, they discontinued them (cooper stt MT)... i'm back on the hunt for tires i'll buy more than once in a row, hahaHave used both in 10 ply rating. Both work well. The Falkens have a more aggressive tread, but are equally quiet. Both have a similarly aggressive side wall to my eye anyway. I have not noticed the wet weather issue some complain a lot on the KO2. I have not found a weakness in the Falkens. Both are wearing well. Have the KO2’s on a Sequoia, the Falkens on a Tundra. Both have done some off roading. The Falkens do better in mild mud than the KO2’s, but neither is a mud tire. About 20k in on both. I give a slight edge to the Falkens for what I do, mostly highway with some off-road use.
Falken has several production plants around the world, not all of the Wildpeaks are made in China. But, it's interesting to see guys complaining about Chinese products as they type on a Chinese made computer or cell phone.I’ve went through two sets of KO2’s. I was considering wildpeaks for my tundra because I can’t find KO2’s in the size I want. I found out that fallen are made in china so it has me considering the toyo open country AT 3’s. I current have the KM3’s. I’ve only gotten about 36k on them and they’ll need to be replaced soon. I’m not off in mud enough to justify them.
This. I ran KOs, then KO2s for years, never got more than 30k out of a set & they don't have a treadwear warranty. Falkens have a 50k treadwear warranty. Head to head, I think the Falkens are also slightly better in the snow and ice.I’ve been really impressed with my wild peaks. I’ve had several sets of BFGs, first set of Falkens, I won’t be going back…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk