I will get back to everyone on that, have a tentative meeting with the 4 hunters soon.Was there enough $$$ in the GoFundMe donations to cover the costs?
Burden of proof is on the prosecutor...I think we still live in the United States.Doesn't matter, burden of proof would be on you.
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
Most hunters aren't Professional Land Surveyors. So they use hand held GPS units and/or their smart phone with some sort of a mapping app. (like Onx)Must be different in WY. In SD it is the hunters responsibility to know where property lines are located.
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
There isn’t a pin at every corner
Yeah but the landowner has to know first. He can't just arbitrarily say you're trespassing and not have concrete evidence. I mean I guess he could but it's not going anywhere.Must be different in WY. In SD it is the hunters responsibility to know where property lines are located.
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
Must be different in WY. In SD it is the hunters responsibility to know where property lines are located.
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
I would think a defense attorney would want to do his or her best to win a jury trial. If they win, the State could appeal and it still goes to the supreme court. As a defendant, you don't want to be the appellee because a lot of deference is given to the jury in terms of facts and inferences. Just my uninformed take.Do we want these hunters found guilty so it can be appealed in Supreme Court and set an actual precedent? If that is the case... hope these defense attorneys continue to not to be super awesome
Much less risky if the airspace clause is in your favor. Imagine being ticketed for trying to locate the pin to prove your innocent.Now there’s gonna be a rush on metal detectors to find the pins.
Because unless there’s an actual corner pin, no gps or OnX will be close enough to corner cross.
I will get back to everyone on that, have a tentative meeting with the 4 hunters soon.
If there was no law, then corner-crossing wouldn't be illegal in WY.What are you taking about? Where is the law that clarified corner crossing? Go ahead I'll wait.
Oh I cross over boundaries all the time. But just like speeding, I'm willing to accept the consequences. Otherwise I wouldn't commit the violation. In CO, you can float a river over private property, but you can't legally touch bottom under the water.I sure hope you never cross over a boundary. Ever. Anywhere. For anything. See the post about the river analogy to help break it down for you...
Apparently it's notIf there was no law, then corner-crossing wouldn't be illegal in WY.
Oh I cross over boundaries all the time. But just like speeding, I'm willing to accept the consequences. Otherwise I wouldn't commit the violation. In CO, you can float a river over private property, but you can't legally touch bottom under the water.