- Banned
- #81
orionthehunter1
WKR
I know two people that have gotten it twice. Once in March and again at the end of October. Both of them had mild symptoms and no after effects.
Always appreciate your take, Greg. Given that you, Fatcamp and others are right on the front lines, it means a lot to hear your take.No I have not, and working in a smaller hospital/ICU, in a state that is second to last for the # of deaths associated with Covid, I just haven’t seen tons of cases. On the flip side, I do have friends, and a few family members that are in the medical profession, in other harder hit places of the country, and from them I’ve heard multiple accounts of young, healthier people dying from it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No I won’t get it.Is anyone else noticing that the actual health care workers on this thread are the ones saying how dangerous this disease is and how the vaccine should be taken? While the average Joe’s are the ones sowing doubt and dismissing the seriousness? That’s very telling to me! I’m going to listen to the pro’s on this one. Seems like a better source of info than the random internet hunter that turns a crank for a living.
We all have to make our own risk benefit analysis. My guess (yes, it is only a guess as hard data is not available at this point) is that the prevalence and severity of vaccine side effects will be significantly lower than those of COVID. Keep in mind that COVID has life altering, long term consequences for some who survive it as well ranging from neurologic deficits to cardio myopathy. These are what we know of now, it is possible that many others will come to the surface as time goes on.
Edit: my memory is not correct. I will post correct information in a new post and leave this as is because the correct information does not materially change the conclusions (it was 10 years ago that I last looked into anthrax and smallpox vaccines, so I should have known not to trust my memory). End Edit
Historically, even really dangerous vaccines such as anthrax have far fewer adverse effects than the COVID death rate alone. The anthrax vaccine, if memory serves, had 1 severe adverse effect per 28,000 doses. This was why it was only ever given to deploying military and perhaps a few others going to biologic warfare risk areas--to cause pulmonary anthrax it must be weaponized, and cutaneous (skin) anthrax infections are not really an issue. Death, or hospitalization would be considered a sever adverse effect of a vaccine. At its current rate in the US, SARS-COV-2 would kill 560 of that 28,000, put another 5,600 to 7000 in the hospital, and cause an unknown (but greater than 560) number of permanent health problems. So, even assuming the COVID vaccine turns out to be 100 times worse than one of the nastiest vaccines I know of, it is still significantly safer than getting COVID.
This is like people who argue that not wearing a seatbelt saved a friends life, so they don't wear theirs. Yes, in a small percentage of MVAs a seat belt might actually be harmful, but the risk from not using it is significantly higher than the risk of using it. Of course, this comparison has hard data to back it up, so it is not completely applicable.
Tactical and strategic decisions have to be made off the best information available at the time. Paralysis rarely works out well, however intentionally choosing to hold a position rather than move is a valid choice. Equally, reflexively charging ahead can be disastrous. So, there is not a simple, preformulated answer to how one should act in every situation.
Personally, after hundreds of hours of research regarding COVID (based on a foundation of thousands of hours of education) and hundreds more working with COVID patients, taking the vaccine is an easy choice even though I'm far from an expert on COVID or infectious disease.
Foot notes:
-2% death rate comes from taking all deaths attributed to COVID and dividing but all positive cases in the US. This does not account for indirect deaths from COVID, being people who do not have the virous, but due to a lack of resources such as ICU beds die even though in normal times they would have survived. Excess death data suggest this number equals about 1/3 of COVID deaths.
-There is not good data on hospitalization rates, most of it comes from small samples early on. So while this number should be taken with a grain of salt, it is reasonable that for every person who dies from COVID 10 would be hospitalized, which is why I'm willing to give some credence to those numbers.
That's a lot of typing just to say you don't know anything about the long term effects of this particular vaccine.The anthrax vaccine is significantly safer than I was thinking, I believe I mixed it up with the smallpox vaccine as I was researching both at the same time while in the military. The anthrax vaccine causes about 1 severe adverse reaction per 100,000 doses. Smallpox is the high risk vaccine. For some context on the risk with the smallpox vaccine and why it was judged acceptable, the more common variola major strain of smallpox had a 30% mortality rate with the less common variola minor strain having a 1% mortality rate.
I will compare the know effects of COVID with adverse events from the smallpox vaccine. For smallpox vaccine, 1 person per 1,000 has a serious, but none life threatening, adverse reaction. 14-52 people per 1 million doses will have a life threatening adverse reaction (I will just use 52/million for the rest of this as this assumption is the least favorable to my position), and 1-2 people per 1 million vaccinated will die as a result (I will assume 2/million for simplicity).
So, assuming hospitalization equate with severe adverse effects (which probably underestimate sever adverse effects of COVID).
Smallpox vaccine 1/1,000 (1,000/million)
COVID 200/1,000 (200,000/million)
Death
Smallpox vaccine 2/million
COVID 20,000/million
Assuming an ICU stay equates to life threatening adverse reaction (I don't have a good source for ICU admission rates, but have came across 5% and given even a death rate of 1% this number is reasonable, so I will use it).
Smallpox vaccine 52/million
COVID 50,000/million
So, even if the COVID vaccine is 1,000 times worse than the smallpox vaccine, it would still be safer than getting COVID. Note, based on the current data it is highly likely the COVID vaccine is significantly safer than the smallpox vaccine.
I'm sorry, but this right here is why the US has far outpaced every nation on earth with Covid deaths, despite being the wealthiest nation on earth with the best health care system.Nope won't get it. I also don't wanna hear I need to do it for the greater good of the "the community"..give me a break and take that virtue signaling somewhere else. "The community" where 65% of the people can't put down a Big Mac to reduce their chance of obesity related issue killing them. Last time I checked heart disease still kills over 650k a year but I am supposed to shoot some ramped up experimental drug into me for their protection? No thanks.
Because of vaccines that were properly tested, anyway.Kind of ironic that everyone who voted no is alive to vote no because of vaccines.
I understand that concern, but when the top Dr's are in agreement that this process has been thorough, who the hell am I to question that?Because of vaccines that were properly tested, anyway.
There are countries with better health care then oursI'm sorry, but this right here is why the US has far outpaced every nation on earth with Covid deaths, despite being the wealthiest nation on earth with the best health care system.
I wasn't aware of that. I live near Houston, which calls itself the health care epicenter of the world.There are countries with better health care then ours
Not one of those top doctors can tell you the long term effects. And the process has not been thorough, as there has been NO PROCESS to test the long term effects.I understand that concern, but when the top Dr's are in agreement that this process has been thorough, who the hell am I to question that?
Really use the google we rank 27th in healthcare, the only thing the U.S. comes in at at number 1 is costI wasn't aware of that. I live near Houston, which calls itself the health care epicenter of the world.
That's hilarious. in 2013 Houston held the honor of the most obese city in the U.S.! Shameful.....I wasn't aware of that. I live near Houston, which calls itself the health care epicenter of the world.
LOL, no, it provides the information to make a decision. What you are doing is the equivalent of demanding a police officer know if a perps gun is loaded or not before he can use deadly force. The odds are good there are not long term effects, just like the odds are good that if someone points a gun at you they intend to use it.That's a lot of typing just to say you don't know anything about the long term effects of this particular vaccine.
I think we're talking about different things. Houston is far from the "healthiest city" in the world. What it does have however, is one of the finest medical centers in the world. Kind of ironic really.That's hilarious. in 2013 Houston held the honor of the most obese city in the U.S.! Shameful.....
We haven't eaten a Big Mac or Micky D's in 16 years. Never will again....
Okay.Really use the google we rank 27th in healthcare, the only thing the U.S. comes in at at number 1 is cost
Are you an infectious disease expert? Because I'm not. I don't do my own dentistry, and I will listen to the actual experts in this area as well.Not one of those top doctors can tell you the long term effects. And the process has not been thorough, as there has been NO PROCESS to test the long term effects.
I imagine a study found on the internet is subject to feedback that it didn’t take into consideration certain factors that make it hard to compare healthcare across countries. If we don’t universally believe experts who are weighing in about the vaccine, we shouldn’t afford rankings any higher deference - even if those rankings are being offered by the same medical experts.Okay.