Bull_n_heat
WKR
As I read the constitution, and I'm sure this will likely not make any friends, it clearly states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
The "well regulated" part is the crux of the whole thing. It's what keeps common citizens from owning bombs. There's always been (an will always be) a national conversation about the interpretation of the constitution. You could make just as good of a case that as long as you are allowed to own a single gun that your constitutional right has not been infringed, than being able to own and arm any gun currently conceivable. Now I don't agree with that, but it doesn't stop it from being true.
And I agree, the 2nd amendment, has nothing to do with hunting. The longer we as hunters get wrapped around the axles on this issue and don't pay attention to the things that matter for hunting privileges, access, and improved wildlife populations, the more we lose collectively.
The "well regulated" part is the crux of the whole thing. It's what keeps common citizens from owning bombs. There's always been (an will always be) a national conversation about the interpretation of the constitution. You could make just as good of a case that as long as you are allowed to own a single gun that your constitutional right has not been infringed, than being able to own and arm any gun currently conceivable. Now I don't agree with that, but it doesn't stop it from being true.
And I agree, the 2nd amendment, has nothing to do with hunting. The longer we as hunters get wrapped around the axles on this issue and don't pay attention to the things that matter for hunting privileges, access, and improved wildlife populations, the more we lose collectively.