Meeker Colorado Wolf Attack

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hunt4lyf

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Oct 19, 2013
Messages
251
Location
Colorado
Hahahaaha that’s funny. You really think there’s that much difference? Those big bad Canadian wolves . Just like they wiped out all the elk in WY MT and ID. 😘

How about this let’s get rid of the non native mountain goats and the non native moose then?
I forgot to address your other comments.

It has nothing to do with what I think, the scientists believe there is enough difference to have them be their own separate subspecies so that should have been at least addressed when this was put before the people, instead they are just called "Gray Wolves" and lumped all together regardless of the subspecies to further the wolf proponent's agenda. It's funny that the only wolf that is differentiated from all others is the Mexican Gray wolf, why is that? By your and the wolf proponent's logic it's no different from any other wolf so just throw some wolves from Yellowstone down there and call them recovered.

Big they are, but bad? That's a human emotion which can't be applied to a non-sentient being, they just do what wolves do which is kill a lot and sometimes eat what they kill. You are trying to deflect from answering my questions with these remarks, none of which I've said, so again, I provide facts which you can't refute so you resort to calling wolves name to try to deflect from having to come up with something legit.

I'm not going to bother with the goat and moose comment, it's irrelevant.
 

Movi

FNG
Joined
Sep 12, 2022
Messages
83
He can't, just as he can't spell "semantics".

And he thinks, just because it's now law that it's right (there's a difference). As a recent transplant out of the People's Republic of Colorado, I can tell you what Jr doesn't understand is that 90% of the pro-wolf funding that drove that vote came from California and the Sierra Club. Furthermore, most of the front range (where all the votes are concentrated) is liberal and pro-wolf, but conveniently voted for their reintroduction on the western slope and not in RMNP where they like to pet the elk while munching granola in their subarus.
Prove it. But you can’t hahahahaha
 

Movi

FNG
Joined
Sep 12, 2022
Messages
83
What is funny? I provide facts and this is what you come back with? Can you provide something a bit more substantial to refute my post?
It’s funny that you think they are different wolves. Are the wolves being reintroduced not wolves?

What is different between the two subspecies? Hahahaha can’t wait for that.

Goats and arguably moose are not native to CO. I’m all about compromise, get rid of those non native mt goats and moose and I’ll support not letting a subspecies of wolves in. Deal? That’s a fair deal since I’m willing to compromise bringing back wolves which are native and getting rid of two ungulates that are no doubt competing for forage of native ungulates…
 

Movi

FNG
Joined
Sep 12, 2022
Messages
83
I forgot to address your other comments.

It has nothing to do with what I think, the scientists believe there is enough difference to have them be their own separate subspecies so that should have been at least addressed when this was put before the people, instead they are just called "Gray Wolves" and lumped all together regardless of the subspecies to further the wolf proponent's agenda. It's funny that the only wolf that is differentiated from all others is the Mexican Gray wolf, why is that? By your and the wolf proponent's logic it's no different from any other wolf so just throw some wolves from Yellowstone down there and call them recovered.

Big they are, but bad? That's a human emotion which can't be applied to a non-sentient being, they just do what wolves do which is kill a lot and sometimes eat what they kill. You are trying to deflect from answering my questions with these remarks, none of which I've said, so again, I provide facts which you can't refute so you resort to calling wolves name to try to deflect from having to come up with something legit.

I'm not going to bother with the goat and moose comment, it's irrelevant.
You know why the Mexican wolf is separate? It’s the only one that can VISUALLY be identified as different. The rest can only be done in a lab…

Way to deflect on the moose and mt goats. You know why? Because it voids your argument all together.

In Wyoming you can get 3 elk tags in one year. Talk about a loss of opportunity. Guess how many you could get before reintroduction? Guess dammit, guess!
 

Movi

FNG
Joined
Sep 12, 2022
Messages
83
A slim majority of voters, not residents, voted it in. Many of those voters are ignorant transplants who fled jobless dumpster fires for greener pastures that they’re now lighting in fire. Let me guess movi…. Pennsylvania? Or any other east coast shit hole, same difference.
Are you saying their votes don’t count?
 
OP
Slugz

Slugz

WKR
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
657
The CPW is not the same as when it was the CDOW. Way more political and not willing to fight the system. Many of the most talented have left or are leaving, just way to much of the politicians leading the system. Yes , unfortunately it is the CPW leading the wolf recovery efforts. Majority rules. Many in the CPW do not hunt and are border line anti hunting today.
True. As evident when you review the resumes of the commissioners
 

Movi

FNG
Joined
Sep 12, 2022
Messages
83
He can't, just as he can't spell "semantics".

And he thinks, just because it's now law that it's right (there's a difference). As a recent transplant out of the People's Republic of Colorado, I can tell you what Jr doesn't understand is that 90% of the pro-wolf funding that drove that vote came from California and the Sierra Club. Furthermore, most of the front range (where all the votes are concentrated) is liberal and pro-wolf, but conveniently voted for their reintroduction on the western slope and not in RMNP where they like to pet the elk while munching granola in their subarus.
I know how to spell semantics. I was privately mocking the spelling of the way he spelled it. Just scroll up, you’ll see it.

Nothing wrong with granola or Subarus btw. That’s a weird flex to have an axe to grind with either.
 

fngTony

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 18, 2016
Messages
5,722
Some of these comments about Lenny don’t seem to be in line with the lessons learned from the illegal dirt bike riding thread…
I didn’t see any comments slandering Lenny, stop making pot shots at the forum rules.
Why is this news?
It’s an issue affecting the state in multiple ways. Why are you trolling?
Wolves reintroduction is a touchy subject, but if they are allowed to be the top of the food chain with no exceptions, gonna get messy, the current food chain is different than when the wolves were in CO long ago
This^^^ I’ll add that our environment/ecosystem isn’t the same either.

Hahahaaha that’s funny. You really think there’s that much difference? Those big bad Canadian wolves . Just like they wiped out all the elk in WY MT and ID. 😘

How about this let’s get rid of the non native mountain goats and the non native moose then?
Your use of Kissing face = disrespect.
Prove it. But you can’t hahahahaha
Bring a better rebuttal.
It’s funny that you think they are different wolves. Are the wolves being reintroduced not wolves?

What is different between the two subspecies? Hahahaha can’t wait for that.

Goats and arguably moose are not native to CO. I’m all about compromise, get rid of those non native mt goats and moose and I’ll support not letting a subspecies of wolves in. Deal? That’s a fair deal since I’m willing to compromise bringing back wolves which are native and getting rid of two ungulates that are no doubt competing for forage of native ungulates…
Are you a Colorado resident?
Are you saying their votes don’t count?
Don’t twist peoples words. You’re trolling, instigating. If you want to debate bring something to to talk about instead of deflecting and twisting.
 

Hunt4lyf

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Oct 19, 2013
Messages
251
Location
Colorado
It’s funny that you think they are different wolves. Are the wolves being reintroduced not wolves?

What is different between the two subspecies? Hahahaha can’t wait for that.

Goats and arguably moose are not native to CO. I’m all about compromise, get rid of those non native mt goats and moose and I’ll support not letting a subspecies of wolves in. Deal? That’s a fair deal since I’m willing to compromise bringing back wolves which are native and getting rid of two ungulates that are no doubt competing for forage of native ungulates…

I don’t believe they are different, the scientists who study them know they are different but when it comes to wolves no one cares about what they say, only that a wolf is a wolf.

How are they different? One evolved to live in the MacKenzie river valley, one evolved to live in the southern Rockies, pretty simple.

You know why the Mexican wolf is separate? It’s the only one that can VISUALLY be identified as different. The rest can only be done in a lab…

Way to deflect on the moose and mt goats. You know why? Because it voids your argument all together.

In Wyoming you can get 3 elk tags in one year. Talk about a loss of opportunity. Guess how many you could get before reintroduction? Guess dammit, guess!

Really? That the best you’ve got? Because they’re visually different, good argument.

No deflection on my part, it’s just irrelevant to the topic. The only argument being voided is yours because you provide no facts unlike myself.

Wyoming is not Colorado, we have 10 times the human population with almost the same size land mass, winter range that is being gobbled up by McMansions on 5 acre lots, a deer herd that is half of what it was 20 years ago and a game commission that is not on the side of resident hunters.

Also, we can get more elk tags than Wyoming but let’s revisit that in 25 years and see how many we get.

And with that said I’m done with you, trolls like you tire me with your mindless drivel and constant deflections.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2022
Messages
40
I didn’t see any comments slandering Lenny, stop making pot shots at the forum rules.

It’s an issue affecting the state in multiple ways. Why are you trolling?

This^^^ I’ll add that our environment/ecosystem isn’t the same either.


Your use of Kissing face = disrespect.

Bring a better rebuttal.

Are you a Colorado resident?

Don’t twist peoples words. You’re trolling, instigating. If you want to debate bring something to to talk about instead of deflecting and twisting.
I wasn’t trying to take a shot at the forum rules, I felt that the use of language like “idiocy” and “boulder transplant” were extremely disrespectful towards a person who was willing to participate in an approach to management that recognizes differing values. Furthermore, when he realized that the approach didn’t work as intended he had the courage to admit that he was wrong—not a common trait these days.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2022
Messages
40
Can you guys delete my account or kick me off? I can’t figure out how to do it. I don’t think this place is for me. I can’t afford any of the gear that everyone uses here, this doesn’t seem to be the place to discuss ethics or resource management, and I think the guy from round valley is trolling me. One parting note, anybody can read what gets posted here, I’ve come across this website many times in the past decade while searching for reloading data. There are a lot of threads on here that advocate for illegally killing wolves, and I can guarantee the anti hunting crowd is using that when they lobby the politicians. K bye
 

Hnthrdr

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,556
Location
The West
Agreed, I'd like to get out but it's not happening for the foreseeable future sadly.
Same here… I wonder if they held another vote, but the catch was you had to have been born in Co to vote if wolves should be introduced, I think the vote would have been no by a landslide… all the introduced idiots who moved here in the last 10 years are really jacking my home state up. Oh and why the heck didn’t we focus on grizzly introduction before wolves? Grizz was definitely part of CO’s landscape. Was it because the anti hunting first man and anti’s in general have been on the record saying that once wolves are back in numbers we won’t need to have hunting anymore? But if grizz was back it may hurt that eco tourist budget by emptying out the overcrowded mountains?
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
380

Wrench

WKR
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
6,269
Location
WA
Oh Colorado.....this is just the beginning. You ain't seen nothing yet.

The first decade will be movement and decline in your ungulate herds. Soon elk will show up in urban areas in greater numbers. Elk will become considerably less vocal. Herds will not vanish....but the impact is very obvious.
 

4rcgoat

WKR
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
1,217
Location
wyoming
Couple questions regarding “shoot, shovel, shut-up:

1. Do you pack a shovel around while you’re hunting or return later with the shovel. I’m concerned about the extra pack weight. Are people carrying lightweight options? Where I hunt it’s pretty rocky, would definitely need something robust and probably a rock bar to be honest.

2. Do you call before you dig? Underground utilities, pipelines, etc.

3. Say I witness one of those you tube hunters shoot one. Does my obligation to help them shovel and shut up outweigh my obligation to report them and post it on the internet cause they’re ruining hunting?

Thanks in advance
Okay,forget the shovel. Shoot.....kill....and let rot
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top