- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
- Messages
- 1,154
That's one option. Another is to try to do something about it if you don't like it.It’s their state, they get to make the rules pertaining to wildlife. Don’t like it? Hunt somewhere else.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's one option. Another is to try to do something about it if you don't like it.It’s their state, they get to make the rules pertaining to wildlife. Don’t like it? Hunt somewhere else.
Not me. I have no doubt it would lead to NR quota cuts and/or outfitter only tags. So even if you win the battle, you will lose the war. NR would end up with some more land they can hunt, and no tag to hunt it with.Sure, but doesn’t a small part of you want to see the WY wildlife commission members release their warm motherly arms off the shoulders of wilderness outfitters just a little bit?
That's one option. Another is to try to do something about it if you don't like it.
Feel free to reread the title for your answer (especially the wilderness part)
Again, I see no comparison between a state limiting the very few tags (insert your CO moose example) issued to res only versus a state not allowing non res from hunting big game ‘IN ALL’ wilderness areas without a guide.
I would like to know if non res hunters can hunt other big game in the moose area you brought up in CO?
Seems like an out of stater of WY can swing a shotgun on birds in wilderness areas but needs payed company if they want to shoot a hoofed animal.
There is a million different ways to distribute a very limited resource
Not me. I have no doubt it would lead to NR quota cuts and/or outfitter only tags. So even if you win the battle, you will lose the war. NR would end up with some more land they can hunt, and no tag to hunt it with.
How would eliminating the outfitter requirements for NR be a loss to me? Tags are still being issued one way or another. If outfitters aren’t required then I would at least have a chance to hunt the wilderness area. Not much would change, you are still drawing from a limited allotment of tags that the resource can substance. It’s not like it would be an OTC tag… It would be just like the other areas in WY that are on a draw system.
Are the outfitters not capped on the amount of tags they can guide?
For the record, hunting WY wilderness isn’t on my short list but it’s hard to understand this point.
I would rather have 84/16 and no wilderness than 90/5/5 and be able to hunt the wilderness. I have hunted in the wilderness many times and it is not worth giving up anything for. Just my opinion.
Hey now it’s hard to shoot a bow out of a truck.The reason Wyoming is so attractive is because most residents don't bow hunt (only like 7%) and those that do aren't very good at it. NR's can come in and clean house. I guess if I was a Wyoming resident I'd want to keep others away, too.
Maybe there should be some additional classes at S2HU... @Billy Goat @fwafwow @Drenalin @Nickofthewoods
View attachment 790929
I always wonder about that number considering x bows are legal during archery season....The reason Wyoming is so attractive is because most residents don't bow hunt (only like 7%) and those that do aren't very good at it. NR's can come in and clean house. I guess if I was a Wyoming resident I'd want to keep others away, too.