Agree. I wrote an LTE in my local paper but it hasn't even been published, pretty pisses about that.Worry it might be a little too late, I think a ton and I mean a ton of people have already cast a mail in ballot….
Agree. I wrote an LTE in my local paper but it hasn't even been published, pretty pisses about that.Worry it might be a little too late, I think a ton and I mean a ton of people have already cast a mail in ballot….
Agreed, just voicing my worries, I think there are 3ish million legal voters. Who knows how many ole Jenna tried to register thoughLast I saw was about 1 million votes. There are about 6 million people. Not too late. Keep pounding the drum. It’s worth the fight.
Interesting article. I think it echoes a major concern from lots of reasonable urban/suburban voters with no real equities in hunting: Prop 127 would force a misguided, poorly written policy on CPW and Colorado. I think even folks with little exposure to hunting can see the clear anti-hunting intent in Prop 127.Denver Post editorial board came out against Prop 127. Not sure it matters to most voters but it may sway some.
The Denver Post editorial board opposes the ban on mountain lion, lynx and bobcat hunting
Coloradans are being asked to ban mountain lion hunting and the hunting and trapping of bobcats and the endangered lynx should the animal ever get delisted.www.denverpost.com
That’s comical. Because their donors are so legit ha. What a bunch of clownsI found this posted on another website. Looks like they are now insulting these wildlife conservation groups. Their true colors are coming out. Do they really care about wildlife management?
View attachment 783715