bayoublaster7527
WKR
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2017
- Messages
- 817
We sort of saw this bubble up back in 2024 during the Proposition 127: mountain lion hunting ban debate. Trish Zornio, self-described scientist and failed Senate candidate, published an article in the Colorado Sun enthusiastically endorsing Prop 127 and encouraging Coloradans to vote in favor. Also in the article Zornio makes the case to not stop at mountain lions, why not ban bighorn sheep hunting too?
Fast forward to today and the topic came back up in public comment during the 18 July CPW Commission meeting. One prominent speaker, Rainer Gerbach (sp), criticized the current reliance on the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) model for managing ungulate populations, particularly bighorn sheep. He argued that this model is scientifically and ethically indefensible, leading to unsustainable hunting practices that threaten the ecological balance. Gerbach (sp) called for a transition to resilience-based wildlife governance, emphasizing the need for policies that prioritize ecological integrity over short-term hunting yields.
If you attend many commission meetings or watch public testimony regarding anti-hunting bills in the General Assembly, you likely know who Rainer Gerbatsch is. He is quite notable in the anti-hunting movement here in Colorado, regularly publishing articles and providing public comment bashing hunters and trappers, spreading false narratives, and advocating for the elimination of hunting and trapping. All in the name of biodiversity and coexistence, of course.
That's right, bighorn sheep hunting is "ethically indefensible". This is the strategy employed by anti-hunting groups in places like Colorado and Washington, calling into question or creating doubt regarding the agency wildlife biologists and their models. Then you make the case to eliminate harvest. Unfortunately this is unlikely to be the last heard of this.
Fast forward to today and the topic came back up in public comment during the 18 July CPW Commission meeting. One prominent speaker, Rainer Gerbach (sp), criticized the current reliance on the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) model for managing ungulate populations, particularly bighorn sheep. He argued that this model is scientifically and ethically indefensible, leading to unsustainable hunting practices that threaten the ecological balance. Gerbach (sp) called for a transition to resilience-based wildlife governance, emphasizing the need for policies that prioritize ecological integrity over short-term hunting yields.
If you attend many commission meetings or watch public testimony regarding anti-hunting bills in the General Assembly, you likely know who Rainer Gerbatsch is. He is quite notable in the anti-hunting movement here in Colorado, regularly publishing articles and providing public comment bashing hunters and trappers, spreading false narratives, and advocating for the elimination of hunting and trapping. All in the name of biodiversity and coexistence, of course.
That's right, bighorn sheep hunting is "ethically indefensible". This is the strategy employed by anti-hunting groups in places like Colorado and Washington, calling into question or creating doubt regarding the agency wildlife biologists and their models. Then you make the case to eliminate harvest. Unfortunately this is unlikely to be the last heard of this.