I can’t stand kids, it’s not emotional. You are twisting singular data points to justify your opinion. Why limiting to just CO? You want to limit attack data based on one state but expand child firearm accidents across the board? You would at least want to compare the same regional scale and a percent, not a count. Even then it would be weak since people leaving guns around the house for extended periods would be a lot different then you carrying one in the woods.We camp in a small tent and fish/scout. Hard to make sure they wouldn’t have access. Far more kids are killed with unsecured guns than bears and mountain lions. When was the last time a bear or lion killed a kid in Colorado? I realize it is hard to keep emotion from overtaking the fact the kids are in more danger if I do carry Without a secure way to store my pistol.
A 9 year old was attacked last week in WA and peruse this link of lion deaths and you’ll see a large chunk are children.
List of fatal cougar attacks in North America - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Prob doesn’t mean much in isolation but let’s not act like some of your hand picked data points mean much either. I’m all for you having your own opinion but calling anyone who sees that your data is weak “emotional” is one of these west coast underhanded comments that leaves room for deniability when called out….but you know that.