No, they are not the same.Same same. And no it would be “detachable magazine”
And the m1 has the same as above, the term detachable magazine was not used yet and who would ever say “hand me another detachable magazine”
Keep reaching…
Lol, yes, I was being pedantic, but it was in response to @TaperPin calling a magazine a clip. Mostly because he also comes across as pedantic sometimes. No offense meant, all in good fun.
No worries, that wasn't directed at you. I was getting annoyed at someone else's nonconstructive one-sentence posts and their refusal to elaborate and just decided to throw out a little bit of a rant there.
Yeah, I haven’t hunted for as long or killed as many animals as some guys, maybe a lot of guys. But in my humble opinion and experience, anyone who thinks their shot placement and cartridge selection means zero follow up shots on elk, maybe hasnt shot very many elk.
TIL FAAFO, who does a fair amount of trolling here and pretending to be an expert, doesn’t know the difference between a magazine and a clip.
I simply point out the obvious holes in much of the bla bla bla bs in the echo chamber from time to time. Don’t worry, I have no delusion that anything I say will in any way change the way you see the the world. I say it for the young guys trying to make sense out of it so all they hear isn’t so one sided.
I didn’t even mention or reply to you. I was talking to/at the person I included in my comment.
You mean passing on shots, like say, an elk's ass disappearing over a ridge?
It’s just one of a handful of “points” or labels that lack any logic or data. If this is an echo chamber, what’s the support that the POV is wrong - apart from lore, custom and quoting some guy who writes for an NRA publication?
I thought this is the purpose of forums like this, to post results so we can all learn something!
Oh the horror! No one is giving up precision by using a 7MM RM or 300 Win Mag. In no way does a 6.5 increase hit rates. What increases hit rates is taking shots within your level of competency and the cartridges capability. However bullet mass and energy have their place.
It's a ridiculous response from those with little experience, lower than normal IQ, or likely both.
Or has no issues shooting a 7-08 instead of a 223 on deer and hogs or using a 30-06 on an elk hunt. The low testosterone comment was mostly to draw out the sensitive types. A more appropriate answer would be than most shoot paper or do very little shooting. Yes if you don't shoot much a soft recoiling rifle is going to be easier for you to shoot. The smaller cartridges work fine in open country or over feeders. A public land elk hunt in Western Washington is not the place for a 243 running a fancy match bullet. It can be done but why? I consider it more likely that those who espouse cartridges like the 223 or 243 for all hunting as probably having little experience, lower than normal IQ or both. I have used both cartridges but for varmints and deer where appropriate. Just because I prefer a 7-08 does not mean I am dumb or inexperienced.
You mean the guy who carries a 9 mm for bear protection and killed a brown with it?
Honest questions for you to answer:
No, "carries" is not accurate, that would be "carried", once. If you had bothered to read Phil's article, you would know that that was a one time deal and that he emphasized that he normally carries a 45 every day. Good try though.
