Gatorgrizz27
WKR
It’s a mess for sure. Inevitably what happens is the winning companies are able to buy out the others, remove all competition, and do whatever they want, especially with high barriers to entry.
The prices NEEDED to go up in order to have some of it return to the shelves. Otherwise it was a mix of people that probably don’t even own guns buying it up to resell on gunbroker for $1/rd, and guys buying more than they will shoot in their lifetime since “it’s never going to be this cheap again.”
As a business owner, I also get that things have to make financial sense, they can’t just build another factory and run it 24/7 at the same prices they have been selling ammo at with equipment that was paid off 20 years ago.
They also do have to monitor the environment, here the shelves are stacked full of 5.56 and it’s just sitting there, with very little else next to it. Running off another half a billion rounds to sit there in case the next race riot happens in a week isn’t a great move either.
However, I don’t agree with their primary goal being increasing dividends for shareholders (not just being profitable in general). I know it’s altruistic, and I feel the same about the music industry, etc, that you have to care about making a good product and meeting your customers needs.
It doesn’t sit well with me to artificially limit supply in order to keep prices as high as possible. I want to take on the most profitable jobs, but also want to grow as long as it’s sustainable.
What this will probably lead to is them dropping many ammo and even cartridge choices to remain leaner and more easily adaptable. You’ll be able to get a couple .30-06 deer loads and 1-2 elk loads, rather than the 40 or so available now. Of course they will brand, market, and package them differently so it appears like there are still a bunch of choices. Older stuff like .250-3000 Savage and maybe even slightly more common stuff like .220 Swift might get dropped entirely.
The prices NEEDED to go up in order to have some of it return to the shelves. Otherwise it was a mix of people that probably don’t even own guns buying it up to resell on gunbroker for $1/rd, and guys buying more than they will shoot in their lifetime since “it’s never going to be this cheap again.”
As a business owner, I also get that things have to make financial sense, they can’t just build another factory and run it 24/7 at the same prices they have been selling ammo at with equipment that was paid off 20 years ago.
They also do have to monitor the environment, here the shelves are stacked full of 5.56 and it’s just sitting there, with very little else next to it. Running off another half a billion rounds to sit there in case the next race riot happens in a week isn’t a great move either.
However, I don’t agree with their primary goal being increasing dividends for shareholders (not just being profitable in general). I know it’s altruistic, and I feel the same about the music industry, etc, that you have to care about making a good product and meeting your customers needs.
It doesn’t sit well with me to artificially limit supply in order to keep prices as high as possible. I want to take on the most profitable jobs, but also want to grow as long as it’s sustainable.
What this will probably lead to is them dropping many ammo and even cartridge choices to remain leaner and more easily adaptable. You’ll be able to get a couple .30-06 deer loads and 1-2 elk loads, rather than the 40 or so available now. Of course they will brand, market, and package them differently so it appears like there are still a bunch of choices. Older stuff like .250-3000 Savage and maybe even slightly more common stuff like .220 Swift might get dropped entirely.