UM Tikka Rings vs….

nksmfamjp

FNG
Joined
Feb 26, 2021
Messages
68
So, just got a Tikka T3X lite veil wideland. 6.5 Creedmoor because I don’t need more recoil to take a deer.

Looking to hunt to 600ish and shoot to 1000ish. Optic had plenty of travel. Optic is a Viper PST Gen 2 3-15x.

Just trying to decide UM Rings vs MT Pic Rail and Warne/Vortex rings. Semi weight conscious, but mostly want tough. Are the UM rings rock solid? Seems odd they are not 7075….
 

BBob

WKR
Joined
Jun 29, 2020
Messages
4,470
Location
Southern AZ
I've mounted two sets of UM Tikka rings for people. They appeared to be a nicely made ring. Hidden recoil pin hardware and well finished. They aren't the nicest I've handled but totally fine. I personally would prefer a direct ring to receiver interface and eliminate a separate receiver/PIC rail/ring combo. That's why I advised these guys to buy the UM rings. IMO If you can get rid of extra hardware it lessens the chance of things going FUBAR. 6061 is generally plenty strong enough for this purpose. 6061 probably hardcoat anodizes the best, 7075 (and others) not so much.
 
Last edited:

WyldGoose

FNG
Joined
Oct 16, 2022
Messages
76
Location
AZ
Just mounted UM rings to my Tikka. They're pretty overbuilt/beefy.
I prefer direct mount to pic rail...lower mount, less stuff to fail, lighter...
 

Bcleck90

WKR
Joined
Jul 2, 2017
Messages
895
Location
Alabama

I’d go UM or a factory Tikka rail.
 

MHWASH

WKR
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
840
Location
S.E.WA
I always chuckle when someone comes on Rokslide and asks if a UM or Rokslide product is any good. This place is so loaded with fanboys, you're not likely to hear any negatives about those products.

By the way, I'm going to order a set of UM rings for my new Tkka 6.5 PRC when it gets here.😁
 

BBob

WKR
Joined
Jun 29, 2020
Messages
4,470
Location
Southern AZ
I always chuckle when someone comes on Rokslide and asks if a UM or Rokslide product is any good. This place is so loaded with fanboys, you're not likely to hear any negatives about those products.
Well the original UM hinged rings were a total fail and had to be recalled. They got pounded into submission right here on RS but I do know what you mean ;)
 
Last edited:

nobody

WKR
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
2,112
As @mxgsfmdpx said above, the rings won’t be the failure point in the setup with UM and Vortex.

Buy the UM rings, swap the vortex for a Maven RS1.2 and you’re golden.
 

pods8 (Rugged Stitching)

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
4,573
Location
Thornton, CO
As mentioned the sportsmatch rings are also an option that many of us have used successfully for years. They're basically a less beefy (but perfectly adequate) design that predated the UM ones. Airguns of arizona sells them here in the states.
 

Trogon

WKR
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Messages
1,303
Location
CO
I really like the Spuhr mount. Simple and solid as it gets. I took mine off to have the barrel threaded, put it back on and zero don’t change. That’s worth the money to me.
 

AZ_Hunter

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
May 1, 2024
Messages
393
I've mounted two sets of UM Tikka rings for people. They appeared to be a nicely made ring. Hidden recoil pin hardware and well finished. They aren't the nicest I've handled but totally fine. I personally would prefer a direct ring to receiver interface and eliminate a separate receiver/PIC rail/ring combo. That's why I advised these guys to buy the UM rings. IMO If you can get rid of extra hardware it lessens the chance of things going FUBAR. 6061 is generally plenty strong enough for this purpose. 6061 probably hardcoat anodizes the best, 7075 (and others) not so much.
100%. UM rings all the way. I will never use a pic rail on a tikka again. The UM design is bullet proof.
 
Top