I haven’t noticed it much but if they are I’m glad to see them promoting hunting. Hunter numbers (overall) have been declining since the 1960’s, I’d much rather see them out hunting than pushing gun control, P.E.T.A. ...etc.
Isn’t it illegal to bait in MT? I won’t listen to anymore hunting podcast, but I find it hard to believe Eastman's would air a podcast like that… then again the “industry” promotes convicted poachers pretty often.
What hasn’t been said on this topic, that hasn’t already been said about Afghanistan…. Bombed out and depleted!
This. That positive association and profile brings brand awareness and drives sales. If you don’t like it, don’t watch it. If it is still there in a while, then that means some people liked it and watched it and bought the products.Companies wouldn't partner with said celebrities if it didn't sell their products.
The easy fix is to stop watching/streaming/listening to and buying from these companies if you don't like it.
I think when one speaks about the negative aspects of social media even the most rudimentary of thinkers are able to distinguish the stark differences between a forum like Rokslide and something like Tik Tok, Instagram, or FB.Uhmmmm, this IS a social media account/site. Just saying.
What’s astounding is you trying to justify to yourself that THIS is not a social media site. It is, plain and simple. Are there different levels of social media sites? Perhaps. But make no mistake, this is a social media site that CAN and HAS influenced others in the hunting community. We are ALL to blame there.I think when one speaks about the negative aspects of social media even the most rudimentary of thinkers are able to distinguish the stark differences between a forum like Rokslide and something like Tik Tok, Instagram, or FB.
And then there are those who apparently cannot see the difference? Honestly, that is astounding to me.
I’ve seen clips of Tik Tok on Youtube. I am literally ASTOUNDED you’re unable to discern a difference.What’s astounding is you trying to justify to yourself that THIS is not a social media site. It is, plain and simple. Are there different levels of social media sites? Perhaps. But make no mistake, this is a social media site that CAN and HAS influenced others in the hunting community. We are ALL to blame there.
But hey, keep throwing those stones…..your glass house is probably plexiglass anyways.
How do you know their experience in the field?My meaning by hunting credentials isn't meant to come off as uppity. I'm just proposing that it's strange for guys with minimal amounts of experience in the field to be telling other people how to hunt. To me it's no different than a guy who renovated his bathroom telling people how to build a new house from the foundation
Straight from Merriam Webster’s Dictionary….but hey, I’m sure swampdonkey has its own published and credible dictionary too.
The only thing that I find lame is when some rich dudes that hire a guide to find success by hitting the easy button. Celebrities, athletes, racing team owners, ect…. Then they act like they are in the fraternity of hunters after they give it a solid three day hunt that “pushed ‘em to their limits@ . They haven’t earned their stripes in my opinion, even if a camera follows them around or if they have a full trophy room that took four years to fill and a $100,000 to do it.I feel like I can't be the only one getting tired of seeing all these former professional athletes/celebrities getting into hunting and being the new poster child for outdoor companies due to their following. It's one thing if they just enjoy hunting and want to participate like everyone else, in that case I'm all for it as everyone has a right to hunt and fish in my mind. However, it feels like every time I look there's a new former professional athlete starting their own hunting show, hunting YouTube channel, hunting podcast, on the cover of hunting magazines, etc. even when they have little to no actual hunting experience. It feels to forced and unauthentic every time I see it as many of them are just using it as a new stream of income. They always rep sellout brands known for using influencers and have to make sure to hashtag every brand they use.
So I guess my question is do other hunters actually enjoy seeing these people contribute to the overcrowding problem and profit off of an activity we love even though they lack the credentials as an outdoorsman? Who actually buys into their BS and follows these people besides brand new hunters who don't know any better yet? I can't be the only one who does an eye roll every time one of these guys starts a new hunting channel/podcast just because they shot one or two critters on a private land outfitted hunt and get free equipment from outdoor companies. I didn't name any individuals or companies by name as I don't love bashing, but it just feels like its getting out of control with the self promotion.
Straight from Merriam Webster’s Dictionary….but hey, I’m sure swampdonkey has its own published and credible dictionary too.
View attachment 530374
I hope you know I’m just ribbing you a bit……all in good fun. But also trying to make us realize that we all influence on these sites in some manner…..especially when we share successes.