Ok. Denial of natural revelation that they are not aware of is ignorance to me but whether it's denial or ignorance the seeker gets same punishment no matter what his circumstances.“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools,”
Romans 1:20-22
You are correct on the traditional Christian view with the exception that they are not living in ignorance but denial.
The evidence is overwhelming that the Bible is true all the historical, archaeological, and scientific findings line up with the Bible maybe not how most would initially expect in some cases. I’ll admit I am not an expert, but many experts have no problem at all looking at our world and it lining up with the Bible. When people are in denial and don’t want to find evidence that lines up with the Bible they can twist to fit their narrative.
Just like others have said this is easier to discuss on the phone or similar, feel free to reach out we would love for you to know Christ.
"The evidence is overwhelming that the Bible is true all the historical, archaeological, and scientific findings line up with the Bible maybe not how most would initially expect in some cases."
If you’re talking about some historical and geographical references in the Bible , yeah many align with known facts. But that’s also true of many ancient texts. The Iliad mentions real cities and battles, that doesn’t make it divinely inspired or prove that gods intervened in the Trojan War.
The question isn’t whether the Bible contains some accurate history it’s whether the extraordinary claims it makes (miracles, resurrections, divine revelation, etc.) are supported by extraordinary evidence. And on that point, the Bible relies mostly on anonymous authorship, conflicting accounts, and unverifiable supernatural claims.
If the Bible were “overwhelmingly” verified by archaeology and science, you and I wouldn’t still be having this debate 2,000 years later.
I appreciate your offer to reach out but I have done enough of that reaching out with my Christian friends and I mean that in a sincere way.