RokStok

Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Messages
780
Yeah I’m definitely looking forward to the lite version. Not that 31oz is terrible but it does add ~.4lb over the stock it’s meant to replace on a rifle that was intended to be lightweight
My “original” carbon rokstock with cerakote and rail was at 31 ounces and change I believe. If my new one on order is +2 ounces for the new carbon, that will be really pushing where I wanted to be weight wise. I am eager to see the lite version as well.
 

TX_Diver

WKR
Joined
May 27, 2019
Messages
2,536
My “original” carbon rokstock with cerakote and rail was at 31 ounces and change I believe. If my new one on order is +2 ounces for the new carbon, that will be really pushing where I wanted to be weight wise. I am eager to see the lite version as well.
What is the new carbon??
 

mxgsfmdpx

WKR
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
5,547
Location
Outside
Curious what limbsaver pad have you decided on?

Also, looks like you have 3 railed and one smooth, what’s your input on the railed vs no rail decision?
Railed is the way for me because I use Spartan bipods. I just haven’t added the Spartan adapter to that gun yet.

All of mine will use the factory pad but with 1/2” worth of spacers if UM will ever get them orderable on their site. Scopes all need to slide back about 3/8” but they are all still zeroed and I don’t want to mess with them right now. All still perfectly shootable as they sit.
 

mxgsfmdpx

WKR
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
5,547
Location
Outside
My “original” carbon rokstock with cerakote and rail was at 31 ounces and change I believe. If my new one on order is +2 ounces for the new carbon, that will be really pushing where I wanted to be weight wise. I am eager to see the lite version as well.
You won’t be able to tell the difference in 2 ounces field carrying your gun, I promise.
 
Top