UncleBone
WKR
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2022
- Messages
- 718
Definitely.Again, IRONIC... In 5 years there will already be a very established population of wolves. Prop 114 should have always been about managing the wolves that are coming naturally.
Definitely.Again, IRONIC... In 5 years there will already be a very established population of wolves. Prop 114 should have always been about managing the wolves that are coming naturally.
I don't understand how they can finalize the plan without even knowing where the wolves will come from. Cpw saying they may get wolves from "private trappers". I have a few questions there. 1. Would that even be legal? 2. Who are these trappers? I am sure that anyone trapping wolves, that would sell them to Colorado, would be given a lot of grief by fellow trappers/hunters. I know theyre trying to make money, but geeze.Article out today, CPW approved the final plan yesterday. 10-15 wolves this winter, 30-50 over 3 years. First release is on state and private from about Avon west to Glenwood and south to Aspen. With I-50 from Monarch Pass to Montrose in the following year.
they chose these areas based on the abundance of public land and relative lack of livestock...as if they will stay put.
Whats more interesting is sounds like multiple private land owners will be assisting with the release by making their land available to biologists.
Yah, "science based" with no environmental studies done...Article out today, CPW approved the final plan yesterday. 10-15 wolves this winter, 30-50 over 3 years. Confirmed the first release is on state and private from about Avon west to Glenwood and south to Aspen. With I-50 from Monarch Pass to Montrose in the following year.
Sounds like multiple private land owners will be assisting with the release by making their land available to biologists.
Polis actually had the nerve to call this "a science-based plan"...nevermind the gag-order put on CPW biologists
Ahdditionally, they specifically avoided federal lands for the release in order to avoid the required National Environmental Policy Act analysis prior to any federal land management agency authorizing releases on federal land, citing inadequate CPW staffing to complete the analysis.Yah, "science based" with no environmental studies done...
Maybe they should put some of that 200 million dollars of their budget to use.Ahdditionally, they specifically avoided federal lands for the release in order to avoid the required National Environmental Policy Act analysis prior to any federal land management agency authorizing releases on federal land, citing inadequate CPW staffing to complete the analysis.
How do we go about it?environmentalists use the EIS process to delay essential projects all the time - occasionally for decades. This is a great opportunity for hunters to use that same play.
I should have read the link before I liked the post... title is a bit misleading. Polis sucks.Heard a report today that Polis is going to VETO this. "It's not the will of the people"
Polis readies veto pen for wolves reintroduction bill
Gov. Jared Polis has been clear about his position on the reintroduction of wolves.www.coloradopolitics.com
They'll regret it when their primary funding source, OTC elk tags, are forced to be reduced due to a rapid decline in elk population.The commissioners and everyone who voted for this should be ashamed of themselves.
That was fast…Polis vetoed it, it’s official.
While you may very well be right, CPW advised against the reintroduction of wolves. That was their official position.CPW cares more about hiker and mountain bike access for their urban constituency that absolutely destroys nature, while claiming to be "pro-environment" by erecting wind farms, solar arrays, and transmission lines. Meanwhile those of us in more rural areas trying to live by using the resources provided by our environment (mineral, wildlife, range) are told to f*** off and f*** your way of life. Hypocritical pieces of dirt.
While you may very well be right, CPW advised against the reintroduction of wolves. That was their official position.