Furthermore, I bet that you could test the returned barrels and prove beyond a doubt that most of them are just fine, and put them back in stock or use them. It makes more sense to test the exceptions. And it would be an interesting experiment.
I agree it will be interesting. You make good points all around. Something to consider. I want to screw around as little as possible for all our sake.
But, I know some people absolutely suck at many simple things that means they can’t shoot….
“Experienced” dudes I meet all the time suck and screw something up. Heck, happens to me too.
It’s why I would use a known system.
Probably bond the action into a chassis and spin on and off barrels. With a known scope, I won’t have to zero much with most barrels.
If I want to play the industry game and shoot a 3 shot group, I can do that if someone uses that standard. But, we know statistically 3 shots is crap.
So that isn’t fair to the customer for me to cherry pick and it isn’t fair to me if the customer can’t shoot the tiny groups he thinks it should.
Now, the PBB I have will all shoot 5 shots into 1/2ish MOA at times and 10 inside 3/4, “if so do my part.”
I’m talking about proving it with 20-30 rounds, realistic “cone” stuff here.
Don’t know how many will subscribe to that. But the industry and most people still buy into a statistically insignificant standard.
It’s hard knowing that and then deciding how to deal with it.
But, I will always be fair. Always, even though one returned barrel sucks away the profit from two other barrels. I will continue to try to make deals and hope people treat me fair.
I have fired customers before, and I will refuse to do any more business with pricks.
I am really struggling with how to do this and make it a good thing for all…
I still don’t know but I feel like I should try. Even if is is weird or hard at first.