RyanT26
WKR
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2020
- Messages
- 1,503
Good. When he loses again corner crossing will be nation wide. Might even bring more attention to land locked public land
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He doesn’t even have to lose. Just have the supremes not take it up. Then the lower court ruling stands. I expect that is what will happen. If they do take it up, expect it to be overturned.Good. When he loses again corner crossing will be nation wide. Might even bring more attention to land locked public land
Honestly I don’t see them taking it. They seem to be plenty busy currently. There has been plenty of people that thought the hunters would lose, but they just kept on winning….I like our chances.He doesn’t even have to lose. Just have the supremes not take it up. Then the lower court ruling stands. I expect that is what will happen. If they do take it up, expect it to be overturned.
Isn't it, at minimum, legal in all of that district?Supreme Court denied to hear the case. Corner crossing is legal in Wyoming.
![]()
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the corner crossing case, which began when four hunters from Missouri crossed a corner in Wyoming.www.outdoorlife.com
Yessir!Isn't it, at minimum, legal in all of that district?
If that were the case, they would’ve done it already. Even asking the Supreme Court to review it was a Hail Mary.I don't think it's over, there's enough money at stake, one of his lawyers will find something else to sue for.
The only way I see the Supreme Court getting involved in this is if another case from another District gets an opposite ruling (which, given the precedent, seems unlikely).If that were the case, they would’ve done it already. Even asking the Supreme Court to review it was a Hail Mary.
Next time you’ll see this come up is when someone corner crosses in one of the states not cover under this ruling and that goes to court.
A precedent has been set.
Like, he secretly wanted the unwashed masses to have access to public parcels inside other ranches like his?Part of me wonders if Fred took this issue this far because he's not a complete dick? If he never would have pushed this issue, corner crossing would still be illegal, so he actually helped make it legal and screwed other landowners who previously were treating the landlocked as their own.
Part of me wonders if Fred took this issue this far because he's not a complete dick? If he never would have pushed this issue, corner crossing would still be illegal, so he actually helped make it legal and screwed other landowners who previously were treating the landlocked as their own.
I'm guessing the statistical probability of that being equal to a giant meteor hitting the Earth tomorrow.Part of me wonders if Fred took this issue this far because he's not a complete dick? If he never would have pushed this issue, corner crossing would still be illegal, so he actually helped make it legal and screwed other landowners who previously were treating the landlocked as their own.
Seriously, dude? He took it this far because he’s a billionaire and used that money and influence to convince some equally dumb$hit sheriff, deputy, and county attorney to go out there and cite the hunters with a bogus trespassing charge.Part of me wonders if Fred took this issue this far because he's not a complete dick? If he never would have pushed this issue, corner crossing would still be illegal, so he actually helped make it legal and screwed other landowners who previously were treating the landlocked as their own.