roadrunner
WKR
The insurance thing seems wise.
Couldn't disagree more...
The insurance thing seems wise.
Fair enough. I have an atty in the family..,Couldn't disagree more...
Another impossible to enforce law… that only law abiders will troubled with, once again this state shits all over our rights…Good grief man. Wonder what kind of proof they'll want for grandfathered firearms.
Power to tax is the power to kill, deny or delay a right. Requiring liability insurance on a right is akin to a poll tax. Plus what if that insurance rate skyrockets? You now are SOL and become a law breaker because you can’t afford it?Fair enough. I have an atty in the family..,
Another good point.Power to tax is the power to kill, deny or delay a right. Requiring liability insurance on a right is akin to a poll tax. Plus what if that insurance rate skyrockets? You now are SOL and become a law breaker because you can’t afford it?
Seems like a single shot rifle for NR travel hunts…
The insurance thing seems wise but they’ll use it to backdoor a gun owner list.
Power to tax is the power to kill, deny or delay a right. Requiring liability insurance on a right is akin to a poll tax. Plus what if that insurance rate skyrockets? You now are SOL and become a law breaker because you can’t afford it?
I do a lot of loss prevention stuff at work. Anyone tied into a project gets sued.What's wise about the insurance thing?
Using it as a barrier for entry, a tax on a right, and others are the first thing that comes to mind on why it is an awful idea.I do a lot of loss prevention stuff at work. Anyone tied into a project gets sued.
I can see a gun owner being liable for crime with a stolen gun. Especially the way CO is going.
Im still trying to decide if ccw insurance is smart. Will it be used against a person or benefit a person?
Do you have health, life, house, or personal property insurance? Why is gun insurance any diff? Aside from the politics. It is to protect you from severe financial loss.
The gun owner is not held responsible for being a victim unless there is an other factors to allow that. Same as your car or any other possession.I do a lot of loss prevention stuff at work. Anyone tied into a project gets sued.
I can see a gun owner being liable for crime with a stolen gun. Especially the way CO is going.
Im still trying to decide if ccw insurance is smart. Will it be used against a person or benefit a person?
Do you have health, life, house, or personal property insurance? Why is gun insurance any diff? Aside from the politics. It is to protect you from severe financial loss.
The problem is not that it exists, the problem would be the government mandating that every gun owner has to have it. That's just more over-reaching government.Why is gun insurance any diff? Aside from the politics. It is to protect you from severe financial loss.
The problem is that the idiots outnumber the non-idiots by a wide margin these days. Voting will never fix that.When you don't go out and vote, this stuff happens. Idiots vote other idiots into office.
Right on.The problem is that the idiots outnumber the non-idiots by a wide margin these days. Voting will never fix that.
AND the democrats voted down a bill last month to increase penalties for firearm theft and possession of a stolen weapon. They don't want to punish the actual criminals or make anything safer, they just want to harass and incrementally make it harder to be a law abiding gun owner.Still BS when this state can't even police their own in Denver that are just shooting randomly on Colfax nightly.
There won’t be for long the way things are moving in some states including CO. The attack on traditional funding of fish and game departments will see to it. All those hunters no longer hunting in CO will end up in other states and dilute the experience in them. We can only absorb so much loss.They are just ignoring SCOTUS, like all good Californians. Bummer for the state. They won't see a cent from me. There are plenty of places to hunt.
Congratulations your new state mandated premium is $1000 a gun per year. Not only that you are now liable for emotional or physical damages that your inanimate object may induce.I do a lot of loss prevention stuff at work. Anyone tied into a project gets sued.
I can see a gun owner being liable for crime with a stolen gun. Especially the way CO is going.
Im still trying to decide if ccw insurance is smart. Will it be used against a person or benefit a person?
Do you have health, life, house, or personal property insurance? Why is gun insurance any diff? Aside from the politics. It is to protect you from severe financial loss.