Kilboars
WKR
Pretty sure they are sponsors of TAC now too.
Maybe if people boycott it now it won't sell out so quick next year!
I missed this year but would love to go next.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pretty sure they are sponsors of TAC now too.
Maybe if people boycott it now it won't sell out so quick next year!
Liberal ;-)I like their black powder instant a bit more than Starbucks via and I prefer their politics quite a bit more than Starbucks. apart from that, i will always preference companies that are owned by and support veterans when I can. More broadly, i dont require everyone or every company I do business with to share my political alignment 100% but there are limits to what I will support and to what I will accept.
LOL, no. Proven he lied about that. First it was photoshopped, then it was a bet, then his history came out. I’ll post the link again that I’ve posted here before and you guys can read it or not.If you listen to Dana Loesch podcast yesterday, you'll learn that at least one of his donations was the result of losing a bet to his military squad.
They knew the worst thing they could do to him was force an Obummer donation. he HATED it.
I can see doing that to someone who lost to me...
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
amen to that!So, from these 4 quotes (I'm not paying for the NYT's so I can't read the source article) they are woke?
- "I’m a man without a party now."
- "What I figured out the last couple of years is that being really political, in the sense of backing an individual politician or any individual party, is really f**king detrimental. And it’s detrimental to the company. And it’s detrimental, ultimately, to my mission."
- "You can’t let sections of your customers hijack your brand and say, 'This is who you are.' It’s like, no, no, we define that."
- "I hate racist, Proud-Boyish people. Like, I’ll pay them to leave my customer base. I would gladly chop all of those people out of my f**king customer database and pay them to get the f**k out.
As someone who has long felt the Republican and Democratic parties are two sides of the same coin I can't say I have any issues with any of those statements.
What’s wrong with the Proud Boys? I remember when Gavin Mcinnes created them as basically a men’s drinking club, that emphasized traditional western values. I know that the leftist media likes to label them as racist etc., which seems odd to me since their ranks are full of black guys and Hispanics and Gavin is married to a Native American woman. It’s the Bolshevik propaganda that has turned the Proud Boys into something they’re not and they’re working on point their “racist” wands at anyone that doesn’t fall into line with their ideology.That statement on "This is who you are" I think is the core issue that BRC is ultimately dealing with. I have seen that "Proud-Boyish" and wannabe tough-guy types began mixing BRC tees and caps along with their closet full of 5.11 and The Punisher gear. BRC gear had the potential to become associated similarly to a Blood wearing red or more to the point a Boogaloo's Hawaiian shirt. They don't want to become part of the "Proud-Boy" uniform. Much in the same way, BRC struggled with messaging and insinuations made about connections to Kyle Rittenhouse late last year.
What’s wrong with the Proud Boys? I remember when Gavin Mcinnes created them as basically a men’s drinking club, that emphasized traditional western values. I know that the leftist media likes to label them as racist etc., which seems odd to me since their ranks are full of black guys and Hispanics and Gavin is married to a Native American woman. It’s the Bolshevik propaganda that has turned the Proud Boys into something they’re not and they’re working on point their “racist” wands at anyone that doesn’t fall into line with their ideology.
Using ar15.com as a source? That’s comical…LOL, no. Proven he lied about that. First it was photoshopped, then it was a bet, then his history came out. I’ll post the link again that I’ve posted here before and you guys can read it or not.
BRCC lies
I don’t think you’ll ever have to worry about making that decision as no one cares what you have to say.I'd drink acid before I sat down with the NYT for anything. They are Marxist insects of the lowest order and even acknowledging them is a huge mistake by any entity.
Rule #1, know thy customer!
I'm surprised that you took the time to reply to the guy no one cares to hear from! grin....I don’t think you’ll ever have to worry about making that decision as no one cares what you have to say.
Can't speak for all of PBs doings, but what you see and read with the MSM is largely based on fake hate and racism.What’s wrong with the Proud Boys? I remember when Gavin Mcinnes created them as basically a men’s drinking club, that emphasized traditional western values. I know that the leftist media likes to label them as racist etc., which seems odd to me since their ranks are full of black guys and Hispanics and Gavin is married to a Native American woman. It’s the Bolshevik propaganda that has turned the Proud Boys into something they’re not and they’re working on point their “racist” wands at anyone that doesn’t fall into line with their ideology.
I dont know much about their entire history or what all of their members have been arrested for etc. But I've been on the front lines watching them, dealing with them, communicating at times with them over the last year. Very respectful and well spoken and never created a problem. But when antifa showed up and started throwing whatever they could get their hands on, attacking the crowd and doing antifa stuff, the proud boys would step in and squash the activities. Then they would leave when antics left or were given a dispersal order.Well, we’ve seen that PB as a group has a propensity to engage in political violence on behalf of a decided political identity, so it’s certainly more than a drinking club. richard Spencer has been a member, he has clear white nationalists ties, so there’s that. By their own decree, in order to reach “4th degree” status, you just get arrested or in a serious violent fight for the cause. I don’t know much about the history of the organization beyond that, but Nathan Bedford Forrest didn’t start the KKK with the intent of the organization becoming what it did, either. In fact, I’ve read he attempted to disband it. History will ultimately judge you based on outcome, not intent, so if you are going to passively claim that PB are little more than a red pill fraternity, then you are overlooking their very deliberate history of actions in favor of a stated intent.
Richard Spencer was never a member and the fact you believe that shows me how ill-informed you are on them. I remember the episode of Gavin Mcinnes’ show when he mentioned creating them and have watched their entire evolution and basically their dissolution from the beginning, with commentary from the creator. They also don’t start fights woth Antifa etc, they end them. They’ve also protected people like Anne Coulter from violent Antifa mobs, which was really the beginning of their more “engaging” political activism. Maybe seek out some perspective from some other sources. Too bad people like Gavin are banned from all of social media and can’t defend themselves and are turned into bogeymen by the MSM, which is the point.Well, we’ve seen that PB as a group has a propensity to engage in political violence on behalf of a decided political identity, so it’s certainly more than a drinking club. richard Spencer has been a member, he has clear white nationalists ties, so there’s that. By their own decree, in order to reach “4th degree” status, you just get arrested or in a serious violent fight for the cause. I don’t know much about the history of the organization beyond that, but Nathan Bedford Forrest didn’t start the KKK with the intent of the organization becoming what it did, either. In fact, I’ve read he attempted to disband it. History will ultimately judge you based on outcome, not intent, so if you are going to passively claim that PB are little more than a red pill fraternity, then you are overlooking their very deliberate history of actions in favor of a stated intent.