“Alaska is Ours”

[BeastOfTheTrees]

You sure hit all of the corners on conspiracy theory talking points there. NATO gonna take over, so we can’t fight the true enemy, the world bank. Also, if America is already run by socialists, haven’t they already taken over?

Been reading 4Chan again, BeastofTheTrees?

We believe what we believe. This thought process looks like the way we are heading. Everyone yelled ‘conspiracy theory’ about Hillary working with Russia, Hunter’s laptop, Epstein’s numerous islands, Klaus Schwab publicly addressing the great reset plan. How about child trafficking and how deep the pockets of the people involved in that are. ‘Conspiracies’

If we were able to follow thoroughly who is paying who, I’d bet there wouldn’t be such a long list of ‘conspiracies’.

It’s funny to scoff at specific taking points because mainstream says to scoff at them.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions.

 

[scattergun]

People in general don't like too or want to kill other people, but sometimes it becomes necessary. If you were in the military, it would not be your decision to invade another country, it would be your duty to follow orders.

Conscription ended nearly fifty years ago, though; nobody’s being forced to join these days. Not to mention that there’s an endless list of civilian massacres that either weren’t ordered, or that should have been refused due to being flagrantly unlawful.

We believe what we believe. This thought process looks like the way we are heading. Everyone yelled ‘conspiracy theory’ about Hillary working with Russia, Hunter’s laptop, Epstein’s numerous islands, Klaus Schwab publicly addressing the great reset plan. How about child trafficking and how deep the pockets of the people involved in that are. ‘Conspiracies’

If we were able to follow thoroughly who is paying who, I’d bet there wouldn’t be such a long list of ‘conspiracies’.

It’s funny to scoff at specific taking points because mainstream says to scoff at them.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions.

What conceivable thought process would lead you to believe that the World Bank and NATO are in any way socialist?

 

[displacedtexan]

What conceivable thought process would lead you to believe that the World Bank and NATO are in any way socialist?

A complete ignorance of what socialism is, and just using it as a catch all buzzword for something you don't like?

 

[BeastOfTheTrees]

Conscription ended nearly fifty years ago, though; nobody’s being forced to join these days. Not to mention that there’s an endless list of civilian massacres that either weren’t ordered, or that should have been refused due to being flagrantly unlawful.


What conceivable thought process would lead you to believe that the World Bank and NATO are in any way socialist?

World bank drives the train. Socialism leads to fascism. World bank lobbyists run NATO. Everyone pushes socialism as the beacon for the people. Then eventually flip it to fascism.

Same song and dance as when the world bank funded the National Socialist German Workers' Party. Better known as the “NAZI” party.

 

[BeastOfTheTrees]

A complete ignorance of what socialism is, and just using it as a catch all buzzword for something you don't like?

Complete ignorance, now when did I throw shade at you? I should have clarified Marxist theory of socialism.

Once again I write almost everytime, MY OPINION. Last I checked this was an open thread. Maybe you’d prefer it to be a censored thread? Where not just anybody can drop their opinions.

 

[scattergun]

That’s totally incoherent. Are you having a stroke or something?

 

[BeastOfTheTrees]

That’s totally incoherent. Are you having a stroke or something?

God I hope so. I stay ready to go.

Oh Rokslide user of wisdom scattergun, tell me the errors of my intellect. For your understanding of world government has to be more logical than mine.

 

[scattergun]

I mean, it’s completely ahistorical and shows a pretty fundamental lack of understanding of what words mean. If you knew anything about the banking industry and NATO, you’d quickly be aware that they’ve always opposed socialism, and have consistently sided with fascism when push comes to shove — often with extreme violence.

It could be that you’re conflating socialism with neoliberalism, in which case your beliefs would make a bit more sense.

 

[Poser]

What is your point? Do you agree with Trump that Putin walked in while all of the other leaders did nothing before and after he invaded? I'm one of the many that believe it would never have happened if Trump was still President.

Or, are you offended that someone could call Putin smart?

Many indications suggest that Putin desired a Trump presidency and that it would have been in his favor in terms of taking Ukraine. If nothing else, Trump seemed to express admiration for Putin and the Trump presidency certainly seemed to have a destabilizing effect on NATO, which was desirable and of benefit for Putin.

What is it about a trump presidency that you believe would have kept Putin on the Russian side of the border? Fear that a president who ran on american isolation policy and expressed admiration for Putin’s tactics would respond with direct military action?

 

[Poser]

We believe what we believe. This thought process looks like the way we are heading. Everyone yelled ‘conspiracy theory’ about Hillary working with Russia, Hunter’s laptop, Epstein’s numerous islands, Klaus Schwab publicly addressing the great reset plan. How about child trafficking and how deep the pockets of the people involved in that are. ‘Conspiracies’

If we were able to follow thoroughly who is paying who, I’d bet there wouldn’t be such a long list of ‘conspiracies’.

It’s funny to scoff at specific taking points because mainstream says to scoff at them.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions.

No one is denying you of your entitlement to you opinion. However, that doesn’t mean you’re presentation of opinion won’t be dissected for further analysis.

For example, how would NATO execute a takeover of the US? Their logistical and expeditionary capabilities are entirely insufficient. Most countries don’t even have expeditionary forces. The idea of a NATO takeover would require draining every soldier from European soil and relying on Great Britain to expedite them to the US. That leaves Europe unguarded. Is your opinion that a World Bank sponsored takeover of the US by NATO hedged on the idea that European NATO is in cohorts with Russia?

China is the only other military in the world potentially capable of that scale of expeditionary logistics.

As for your “supportive” conspiracies, Epstein and what not, none of those examples exist anywhere on the scale of a world bank Sponsored NATO takeover of the US and the truth of a sex trafficking scandal doesn’t validate a global military conspiracy.

 

[BeastOfTheTrees]

No one is denying you of your entitlement to you opinion. However, that doesn’t mean you’re presentation of opinion won’t be dissected for further analysis.

For example, how would NATO execute a takeover of the US? Their logistical and expeditionary capabilities are entirely insufficient. Most countries don’t even have expeditionary forces. The idea of a NATO takeover would require draining every soldier from European soil and relying on Great Britain to expedite them to the US. That leaves Europe unguarded. Is your opinion that a World Bank sponsored takeover of the US by NATO hedged on the idea that European NATO is in cohorts with Russia?

China is the only other military in the world potentially capable of that scale of expeditionary logistics.

As for your “supportive” conspiracies, Epstein and what not, none of those examples exist anywhere on the scale of a world bank Sponsored NATO takeover of the US and the truth of a sex trafficking scandal doesn’t validate a global military conspiracy.

Our current leaders would simply sign our sovereignty over or already tried at least medically. I am not saying that NATO would expeditiously assault and conquer our home soil. Now could I see NATO taking control of the US in say the next “Pandemic”. Absolutely.

 

[FLATHEAD]

The "Liberal World Order" is not a conspiracy theory.

 

[scattergun]

Don’t forget that NATO was founded to serve the interests of US imperialism, and continues to do so. The idea that it’s a threat to the American establishment is ridiculous.

 

[BeastOfTheTrees]

I mean, it’s completely ahistorical and shows a pretty fundamental lack of understanding of what words mean. If you knew anything about the banking industry and NATO, you’d quickly be aware that they’ve always opposed socialism, and have consistently sided with fascism when push comes to shove — often with extreme violence.

It could be that you’re conflating socialism with neoliberalism, in which case your beliefs would make a bit more sense.

The Nazi Party started as a worker’s socialist movement. Ended up a fascist dictatorship. Same concepts apply today where we are heading.

They were funded by the rothschilds who run the world bank. I’m sure it is way more complicated than that but that’s what I think.

 

[scattergun]

Don’t let the name fool you. The Nazi party was about as socialist as the DPRK is democratic.

 

[Poser]

The Nazi Party started as a worker’s socialist movement. Ended up a fascist dictatorship. Same concepts apply today where we are heading.

They were funded by the rothschilds who run the world bank. I’m sure it is way more complicated than that but that’s what I think.

And The World Bank’s history of buying up debt of poor countries, in some cases, the debt owed to imperial expansion, and acting as a debt collector sounds like a socialist strategy to you?

 

[fngTony]

This thread is going on some long tangents, let’s reel it in a little.

 

[BeastOfTheTrees]

Not to mention that NATO was founded to serve the interests of US imperialism, and continues to do so.

Exactly it’s all one big machine. They let us go long enough now they want to reign the US back in for a world government. Global Reset.

NATO is controlled by a whole bunch of groups.

I just believe we got way bigger problems than Russia. Our government’s reach and the way lobbyists from Europe who are aligned via NATO, WHO, Bilderberg, you name it. That’s our biggest threat.

It’s been real bro.

 

[BeastOfTheTrees]

This thread is going on some long tangents, let’s reel it in a little.

aye aye captain.

 

[BeastOfTheTrees]

And The World Bank’s history of buying up debt of poor countries, in some cases, the debt owed to imperial expansion, and acting as a debt collector sounds like a socialist strategy to you?