Wyoming Passes 90/10: The Worst Article You’ll Read This Year

Status
Not open for further replies.

BuzzH

WKR
Joined
May 27, 2017
Messages
2,228
Location
Wyoming
Yeah your the seller advertising a good and opportunity to drum up a willing buyer, once you sell it you can’t change it. Kind of like selling a new Range Rover yet giving the buyer a Pinto. Wonder how many other states have collected as much in prf pt fees and then in essence removed their opportunity unless they have 24 years in the game, be different if the state didn’t charge for this stand alone.

This could end up being what end prf pts across the west.

You easily could be right but that doesn’t mean it won’t cost the state anything to defend it.
Your opportunity to obtain a tag has not been removed or your points taken from you.
 

Squincher

WKR
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
634
Location
Midwest
Absolutely. When i saw this thread yesterday, my first thought was how long it would take for him to jump in and tell everyone how the article was wrong and everyone involved was an idiot.

Could you imagine any legitimate organization wanting this clown in any leadership or public-facing position? It's bad enough to go on and on in public about things he obviously doesn't understand, but to also be so stupid as to not know when to just shut up and take the win?
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,941
Your opportunity to obtain a tag has not been removed or your points taken from you.
So if WY sells me my 1st pt this year your saying I have an opportunity in a normal persons lifespan to draw, even if I’m 60?

The pts were not taken, they are just worthless unless you are one of the top 200 in pts.

Truthfully at the very least WY shouldn’t even allow any new NR to get pts or make it random and refund those that they extorted for all these years fully knowing 99% would never have an opportunity.
 

Laramie

WKR
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
2,649
I'm the case of a willing buyer purchasing a point they received... absolutely no liability. They got exactly what they paid for and there was no promise or implied assumption that allocations would stay the same. No assumption tag numbers would stay static. No promise the point system wouldn't be done away with (which happened in Montana in the 1970's).

File the lawsuit see what happens...best way to find out.
"A preference point system will ultimately guarantee an applicant a license."
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
305
Could you imagine any legitimate organization wanting this clown in any leadership or public-facing position? It's bad enough to go on and on in public about things he obviously doesn't understand, but to also be so stupid as to not know when to just shut up and take the win?
From Mayo Clinic:
Narcissistic personality disorder — one of several types of personality disorders — is a mental condition in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for excessive attention and admiration, troubled relationships, and a lack of empathy for others.
 

KHNC

WKR
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
3,647
Location
NC
Could you imagine any legitimate organization wanting this clown in any leadership or public-facing position? It's bad enough to go on and on in public about things he obviously doesn't understand, but to also be so stupid as to not know when to just shut up and take the win?
I can't. Ive never even met him and my initial thought was that he is uninformed and claims to know everything there is about hunting. And amazingly, he isnt a Non-Resident of any state he hunts. Only us fools are non-residents and uneducated.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OMB

KHNC

WKR
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
3,647
Location
NC
That straight from the Wyoming Game and Fish. That statement is now 100% false. Wyoming did deceive it's buyers but the legal question will ultimately end up being was it intentional.
Just a matter of erasing it off the website, and its like it never existed. Just like killerys emails.
 
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
3,555
Location
Washington
I honestly don’t care about the change in the draw allocation / odds but I do think any NR that were applying in the draw for the big 5 should have the opportunity for a full refund of their preference points due to this change.

An idea… in exchange for a refund they can no longer apply going forward. Sounds fair to me.

And when 90/10 is applied for deer and elk I do hope Wyoming residents pony up for increased tag costs. They are going to need too. That is my opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

BuzzH

WKR
Joined
May 27, 2017
Messages
2,228
Location
Wyoming
I can't. Ive never even met him and my initial thought was that he is uniformed and claims to know everything there is about hunting. And amazingly, he isnt a Non-Resident of any state he hunts. Only us fools are non-residents and uneducated.
Non resident of 49 states all of which I'm fully supportive of their residents to allocate their hunting as they see fit. Including keeping 100 percent of their hunting for residents only, as north Dakota does with moose.

Seems a one way street though for nrs of Wyoming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wyo

307

WKR
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
1,949
Location
Cheyenne
I think the mistake is when people bought into a system that they believed was static, when that was not ever the case.

Nobody would complain if the populations had gone up significantly and the odds were much better than when you started gathering points.

I understand being upset about the situation, but that's a long way from having a valid claim for damages when the system was never guaranteed to remain static.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top