Why is the .270 dying?

[Formidilosus]

Here is your quoted comment for you to read again. You need to read my original entire post again and then reread again since your comprehension is lacking.

No doubt it is.

You always seem to disregard others when it doesn’t suit what you think is your expert opinion.

Really? Please post an actual conversation or argument that I disregarded where factual, demonstrable information was given.

Seems to be your style to conveniently not remember what you wrote or what you stated when you are challenged.There was way more going on in the 1950’s and 1960’s in cartridge development than today.

This is what I wrote-

The amount of people that understood anything about what we see as modern case designs could have fit at a family dining table in the 1950/60’s.

There is nothing “modern” about a Weatherby or 7mm REM Mag, or a 300wm blown out and necked down to 7mm.

Go ahead and name the people before the 1950’s that knew what is now known about modern case designs and chamber/throat dimensions.

Dude you are not the expert you claim to be or want to be. Why anyone values your opinions amazes me!

Hmmm. Please post a single time that I have said I was an expert on anything. For fun, please educate me on what factual statement I have made that you believe are incorrect.

 

[MtnW]

Go ahead and name the people before the 1950’s that knew what is now knowing about modern case designs and chamber/throat dimensions.

 

[MtnW]

Perfect example above . Now you conveniently changed your quote dates to “Before the 1950’s” , where your original was 1950-1960’s.
You are not a self proclaimed internet expert??? Really? You comment on about every third gun/scope/shooting related post. By the way are you ever going to show us pics of the game you hunted and killed outside of the one small branch antlered elk?
Carry on as the self proclaimed internet shooting expert.

 

[Formidilosus]

Perfect example above . Now you conveniently changed your quote dates to “Before the 1950’s” , where your original was 1950-1960’s.

You don’t even quote it correct. I didn’t change anything- every person can go look at what I originally wrote.

You are not a self proclaimed internet expert??? Really? You comment on about every third gun/scope/shooting related post.

Hmm. I’ll have to pump those numbers up.

By the way are you ever going to show us pics of the game you hunted and killed outside of the one small branch antlered elk?

Haha. Do what? THAT is your massive “proof”. There are probably 200 pics of different big game animals I have posted on here. You don’t even make sense.

Everything you wrote here anyone in 5 minutes can see is outright false.

Carry on as the self proclaimed internet shooting expert.

So I guess you won’t educate me on what factual statements I have made that you believe are incorrect?

 

[MtnW]

You don’t even quote it correct. I didn’t change anything- every person can go look at what I originally wrote.



Hmm. I’ll have to pump those numbers up.




Do what? There are probably 200 pics of different big game animals I have posted on here. You don’t even make sense.

Everything you wrote here anyone in 5 minutes can see is 100% false.





So I guess you won’t educate me on what factual statements I have made that you believe are incorrect?

Over time people like yourself self destruct on the internet. Go ahead and pump yourself up. Wantabe internet influencers are a dime a dozen. Arrogance usually is one of the first signs of insecurities . You my internet adversary have plenty of arrogance. Maybe some of the Napoleon complex too?

 

[Formidilosus]

Over time people like yourself self destruct on the internet. Go ahead and pump yourself up. Wantabe internet influencers are a dime a dozen. Arrogance usually is one of the first signs of insecurities . You my internet adversary have plenty of arrogance. Maybe some of the Napoleon complex too?

Per usual.

 

[Ganderzone]

Ultimately I believe the gun manufacturers are largely following suit to the ammo manufacturers. Browning is making a fast twist 270 win that allows for extended length in the magazine and faster twist, if the rifle manufacturers start to adopt this concept you will see a resurgence of some of the legacy cartridges. Imagine a long throated 30/06 with extended magazine length, correct twist and a throat in a factory rifle. My hunch is the next craze will be updating legacy cartridges and marketing them as the next best thing.

 

[Smithb9841]

Ultimately I believe the gun manufacturers are largely following suit to the ammo manufacturers. Browning is making a fast twist 270 win that allows for extended length in the magazine and faster twist, if the rifle manufacturers start to adopt this concept you will see a resurgence of some of the legacy cartridges. Imagine a long throated 30/06 with extended magazine length, correct twist and a throat in a factory rifle. My hunch is the next craze will be updating legacy cartridges and marketing them as the next best thing.

That could be possible I wonder how companies would differentiate which new loads will only work in newer rifles with faster twist and need a longer mag box?

For the record I really like the idea of a 270 shooting 170 EOL at over 2900fps.

 

[Q_Sertorius]

This doesn’t seem to be a real problem for the 5.56/.223 loads on the market. The longer heavier loads might not shoot great in an old .270, but they wouldn’t be unsafe.

Even for rifles where different loadings are unsafe, there are not that many issues. There are .45-70 loads of at least three different load ranges available on the market - some for the weakest old actions and others for more modern actions.


____________________
“Keep on keepin’ on…”

 

[Ganderzone]

That could be possible I wonder how companies would differentiate which new loads will only work in newer rifles with faster twist and need a longer mag box?

For the record I really like the idea of a 270 shooting 170 EOL at over 2900fps.

I'd imagine they modernize the rifles/ chambers first to allow them to shoot the existing ammo and open the door to modern high bc bullets. Would we then see high bc factory loads come to market after while once there is a platform for the loads? Just thinking out loud here.

 

[Smithb9841]

This doesn’t seem to be a real problem for the 5.56/.223 loads on the market. The longer heavier loads might not shoot great in an old .270, but they wouldn’t be unsafe.

Even for rifles where different loadings are unsafe, there are not that many issues. There are .45-70 loads of at least three different load ranges available on the market - some for the weakest old actions and others for more modern actions.


____________________
“Keep on keepin’ on…”

The fact some wouldn’t shoot great I don’t think would be an issue but I’d be more concerned with the loads not chambering or fitting in the mag box. I would imagine that would be a nightmare for ammo companies to deal with all the phone calls and customer service issues that would come with it.

 

[FredH]

So with standard bullets with BC's of over .500 available and muzzle speeds being close to 2900 fps with these bullets I fail to see where there is a problem with the 1-10 twist rifles. That twist stabilizes the 150 gr. Ballistic Tip which has a BC of .496. This provides a pretty darned good level of performance way out there. If you can't take care of the vast majority of shooting problems with these ballistics it's not a twist issue.

 

[The Guide]

Perfect example above . Now you conveniently changed your quote dates to “Before the 1950’s” , where your original was 1950-1960’s.
You are not a self proclaimed internet expert??? Really? You comment on about every third gun/scope/shooting related post. By the way are you ever going to show us pics of the game you hunted and killed outside of the one small branch antlered elk?
Carry on as the self proclaimed internet shooting expert.

 

[ozyclint]

A day late and a dollar short on page 17, BUT I highly doubt this cartridge is dying, it's just not fancy and cool to talk about.

Cool enough for 18 pages so far.

 

[Southern Lights]

Ultimately I believe the gun manufacturers are largely following suit to the ammo manufacturers. Browning is making a fast twist 270 win that allows for extended length in the magazine and faster twist, if the rifle manufacturers start to adopt this concept you will see a resurgence of some of the legacy cartridges. Imagine a long throated 30/06 with extended magazine length, correct twist and a throat in a factory rifle. My hunch is the next craze will be updating legacy cartridges and marketing them as the next best thing.

This year I was wanting to switch to monos as I think the writing is on the wall for lead, and I wanted to just eliminate thinking about it. All these years I've been shooting the 270 and it turns out to be a great monometal cartridge. Drives 129 LRX at about 3100 fps. It sends 110TTSX at almost 3400fps. My 30-06 drives 130TTSX at 3100 as well. The larger cases and powder capacity are not a negative if you want speed to make monos work well at longer ranges.

I have tried the 6.5CM as well with 120gr Sako Blade that is doing a respectable almost 2900fps, but the 270 LRX carries the speed further with less drift.

I think if monos become more and more required for hunting that these older cartridges could see a resurgence.

 

[flyfisher117]

I'd imagine they modernize the rifles/ chambers first to allow them to shoot the existing ammo and open the door to modern high bc bullets. Would we then see high bc factory loads come to market after while once there is a platform for the loads? Just thinking out loud here.

The issue is your average Joe, 10 rounds a year, bubbah. Bubbahs going to buy these new ammo/projectile offerings and be upset when it doesn’t work in grand pappies old deer rifle. They are then going to trash who ever made the ammo because they don’t know what they don’t know.