I’m not knowledgeable enough to understand objective quality when it comes to bows, but that’s definitely my primary interest. I’m willing to spend more if it is for quality, but from everything I have read/heard the big 3 cost more primarily d/t marketing and reputation.
I will try to phrase this a different way, given the highly subjective nature of value. Take an MSRP $999 bow, from any brand. Is the Hoyt/Mathews/Bowtech objectively higher quality than the $999 Elite/Bear/the rest of the field?
What did you ultimately decide on?Bows don’t get discussed quite as much as rifles on here. It’s pretty hard (impossible even?) to find any questions about rifle recommendations that don’t get lots of Tikka replies. It’s an understandable response, especially given sales pricing in years past - Tikka unquestionably gives a lot of bang for your buck.
What is (are) the hunting bow equivalent(s)? Light, relatively cheap, reliable, smooth, quiet.
I understand both rifles and bows have a very personal element, but it’s pretty clear Tikkas are a great value at their price point. Surely the same kind of value exists in the world of bows.