rayporter
WKR
that part about "leaving your ego at home" is what trips up many.
This!A lack of ranges past 100 yards, and this annoying "work" thing that seems to continually interrupt my life. What time I can spend, particularly at longer distances I use only my hunting rifle and the loads that i hunt with.
What I've learned from this thread is how spoiled I am where I live. I have two ranges to go to that I can easily shoot anywhere from 100 yards out to 2000 yards 15-20 minutes from my house.
The new one they added out here is state of the art. So good i actually bought an annual membership for it.Colorado folks have it good with range options. Even the public operated one I went to last year was great compared to what i've seen in much of the country.
Which one is that?
I’m a big believer in the idea that no one rises to the occasion in moments of stress. Everyone falls to their level of training.
I don’t have any desire to enter matches, but you can compete with your friends and get a lot out of it. Set a timer and have a series of shots at varying distances and different shooting positions. Put some
money on it so you have something to gain/lose.
Agreed. What most hunters are doing is not training though. Shooting your rifle at the bench or prone is not training, and that’s what most guys, including myself up until a few years ago, do.
Sounds like you've dug deep into this and well on you're way to get the proper perspectives and set up for your goals. Which are?...Hunting? If so....Maybe the more important questions for you now are...what's your typical 3 shot group accuracy in field conditions? Is your first shot (cold bore, cold body) always on the mark? That you can then apply to how far you may be shooting at critters. Are you closer to moa than not for majority? Moa takes guys to about 600 yards which coincidentally lands around that 3/4 second time of flight where both rifle and archery guys seem to have on game distance limits on but don't really corroborate that back to time of flight on animals and they may be invisible barriers but barriers worth paying attention to. Confirmed even by Form here very few consistent killers beyond 600 out there, I'm sure plenty good at killing steel after some sighters and with pals giving them directions lol...so ask as many questions as to why that is. I think I've given you the two/three best indicators to start with...the amount of competition you do may not help you go any further, unless you're consistent half minute or less, always on mark 1st shot cold, and really really extra on your wind and animal reading calls as you stretch into the 1+ second tof and 20' elevation arcs and beyond. Practical limits apply to more of us than not when it comes to game, although gear can go well beyond it without risk on target.Funny this should come up right now. I've spent the last several months exploring long range shooting and my plan is to get my rifle set up so it is possible, follow up with a training class and then find a match to test my gear, training and skills.
I have tried hard not to fall into the rabbit hole of equipping for a match. I am trying to be a well rounded rifleman, not the most effective long range shooter. My rifle weighs 9 pounds including scope, bipod, sling and suppressor and I feel that I've selected all of this correctly for a general purpose rifle without slipping into specialization.
I worry about a tripod. Am I just wasting time and money on a match if I don't have a $1200 tripod? Is a $200 tripod just pissing money away? It honestly sounds like it is. I also have heard that borrowing one is an option so maybe this isn't such a big deal for my first match or two.
Here's the more concrete problems:
1. Very few places to train. Within 2 hours of me, I don't think there is a single range open to the public that allows for true long range shooting. I have access to a farm where I can set up 350 yards and might be able to use a bulldozer to stretch that to 450 but that's it.
2. Lack of matches near me. I'm in Central VA and I know about Pigg River but it looks like those are PRS only which really doesn't sound appealing. Even then, they are 3 hours from me and have very few matches on the calendar. There are no NRL Hunter matches within a 1 day drive, except for a single 1 day match in TN and they don't have the date listed yet. There is a 2 day match at Arena but it is early Feb and I'm not sure I'll be able to get a long range class under my belt before that one. Shooting a match without having actual DOPE and a bit of training seems wasteful.
I want to do this. I'm going to do it, but there are hurdles. I do have a plan for training and that is the guys at Bang Steel in Wytheville VA. From their web site, podcast and the articles they have written, they look like a good match for what I'm trying to do. NRL Hunter seems like a good match as well but wish they did more East of the Mississippi. The Guardian matches also seem promising and I'll see if their 2023 schedule comes this direction.
Yes. Field stress on game stress is very different than competing against people stress. We all know the range pro's who when presented with a deer in front of them can't hit the broadside of the barn, empty their gun without touching the trigger, drop the magazine, completely sh1t their pants etc. etc.
There are practical limits and rules that apply to majority as soon as it's 'hunting' and as soon as that's acknowledged a whole shat ton of the gear/methods that keeps coming up on here is no longer necessary and just extra noise that more likely to be in the way than helpful. (Snip)
Re; Levi Morgan vs the 3 legends...it just is, he spent too much time circle jerking around the 3d circut while the other guys were out there killing after doing what was minimally necessary to be proficient with the gear of the time. He simply could not make up the time. The books will show it (archie/chuck). As for Tim, well his shit on film, no one alive can touch him as a killer with stick and string. There may only be one like him.How do you know this to be true?
You are the one living in the non-realistic world, no one seems to know anyone or a select group of hero's like you and your team. You have a pressing need to speak common languages among multiple people and teaching newbs quickly. That's not normal for hunters or hunting. Why not just caveat that more often. Your needs or recommendations don't necessarily crossover 100.Actually, yes. I see between 30-50 big game animals a year taken, almost all by those same people.
Just against my fluent range pro/hunting pro pal. One of us enjoys both and excels pretty well at both also, and from what I've seen he is a rare combo but he's had some issues afield caused by the target gear and set up, it's cost him, he's told me and I've witnessed as well. And I've competed against him..In the field...very successfully, but at the range he shoots smaller groups.And you know this because of what experience competing?
Bold statement on a forum lol, I dig it, as they say, you can't kill anything if you don't shoot at it, lmao. Real ones know and closers close. Not sure what we're arguing on this point but I have a much stronger stance and personal limitation on 1st round hits, cold bore, cold body, 1st shot in a field situation with the gear you'd normally have is how I prepare for hunting. Not really down with sending sighters on animals lol but hey if you're a closer you'll get'r'done. Our gear far exceeds our own typical limitations and also the typical field limitations on game that are present. The juice isn't worth the squeeze trying to chase down the next level of performance nodes you'll likely never apply afield on game. Wasting your time competing against other people for nothing useable in hunting, 12" squares, 600-1000 yards etc.Well I’m killing multiples of hundreds of game animals, and seeing thousands killed by others, I would say that second round corrections are very important and nearly as important of a skill as first round hits past 300’ish yards. Past 500’ish second round corrections done quickly is more important that first round hit ability. Or at least that is what has shown up in those animals killed.
Yes, and we've confirmed here in this forum that our brains are wired spatially and visually. So doing the math with reticle, measuring miss, then applying correction to now moving animal is training in the wrong direction...works on steel targets that don't walk or run away when the shooting starts lol. But on animal we will have already measured the miss and applied the hold without anything other than the main crosshair needed because that's how our brains are wired. Hang on mr. sheep, I didn't mean that one, hold still a second so I can re-measure and try that again lol. Are you really using reticle hold points on the follow ups? Man if you are then you're bypassing the brain's visual/spatial wiring and complicating things. When I used wind hold reticles the last thing I used on follow up was those hold points, brain took over and just ran on auto pilot. So eventually went away from the useless noise.How do you know this? I don’t generally miss- I’ve missed twice in the last 60-70 animals; but I people do miss and in over 90% of cases they get a second shot. For someone that is trained correctly, they will spot their own impact/miss, correct and send another round as fast or faster than a spotter could could call it.
Could not agree more with the first half of that. So what thee fack are we talking about here? We are talking about the typical human limitations, cold bore first shot with actual gear hauled afield and typical field accuracy capabilities, typical game/field limitations. So you are essentially agreeing with pretty much everything I'm saying...but then you say you should use gear and methods designed for varying needs unrelated to hunting? You can track hit rates, time to shot, field accuracy, cold bore cold body readiness with a 7 lb, 3-9x, rangefinder, backpack and be deadly af within the ranges here and much faster than with all the stuff you're talking about. If you didn't have a pressing need to educate countless newbs and speak a common language to groups in competitions then I don't think you'd be shooting what you're shooting. Just say so, be real about you live in a completely different world somehow than the majority of hunters. There's something I learned early in my hunting career, more practice isn't better, less of the right practice is best. Same goes for gear, less of the right stuff is more.I never said that it’s “marginal if not detrimental to the killers focus” beyond 600. Most people, regardless of equipment, do not have enough knowledge, skill, or ability to be taking shots on animals past 450’ish yards in broken terrain- that’s factually true. That has nothing to with what is the best “setup, gear and practice”. That can only be determined by shooting and tracking performance differences in hit rates and time to hit between techniques in large data sets…. Generally called competition.
Ya I'm down with that. Remembering hunting. Sub-moa to moa gets er done. Yup my bud can shoot half minute or less all day with his custom everything and out does me at the range on group sizes, but I'm there all day long with my 3/4 moa average 3 shot groups with my factory stuff. And really there in the field, super fast. So this is where the accuracy obsessed target guys get lost all the time. Chasing groups and ultimate accuracy on the range spending 90% more time chasing less than 1% more effectiveness for hunting proficiency and needs.Actually that’s not we’ll known at all. That is an excuse that people who don’t perform when measured objectively use- “ya, well if it was real, I would have totally dominated”. What had proven out repeatedly in every single study and research project measuring stress and ability is that there is no “magic” ability to perform above someone’s baseline under stress. In other words- if you can’t do it consistently on a range, you can not do it consistently “for real”.
War has fack all to do with this. You're not protecting your nation. The animals aren't shooting back, how much and what kind of stress should you train for? Systems that need to be cross trained readily and quickly to many people and triple and quadruple the distances and pressures than hunting or competitive shooting. Chasing unrealistic and unrelated goals spending unproportional amount of time for little to no gain for task at hand. Why do that? Not sure how you go there. Remember you agreed, most struggle past 450 and few will consistently kill past 600 and field consistent moa works.The highlighted part is so laughably false, it boggles the mind as the information is not hard to find. Point in fact, historically the best units in war (read most effective) very often had high levels of competitive background, or outright demanded their members to compete. All of the data collected over the last decade since it has been really measured and looked at has found a direct correlation between someone’s on demand shooting skills, and their performance under stress. So much so that an entire branch of the US armed forces has completely rewritten their marksmanship doctrine.