Best thing to come of this thread is that we’ve better defined ‘long range hunting’. We now know it to be a mpbr to 600 yard game for majority. Anything else they should create new sub forums for ‘extreme long range hunting’ (600+), and a competitive shooting one, call it prs but that could just be the current flavor, f-class was popular not that long ago for example, so may want to label it ‘range sports’ or whatever.
It took a guy who ‘does everything’ to help define these limits, and a guy who apparently does nothing lol. It’s funny how the guy who apparently does nothing happened to come to the same conclusions. Maybe while some were out there competing against others in shooting events I was out there dialing up or reticle referencing big game to 575 and coyotes to 620 on a regular enough basis from prep on my own gongs. Just maybe. The guy who does everything and has some sort of culling volume opp. feels that he can speak on absolute authority over everyone else because no one else has that opp. Nice tall horse to sit on even if irrelevant to the now defined 'long range hunting'. Gophers don’t count, even though killed millions, coyotes don’t count, even though hunted them hard for decade or more, actually hunting year round doesn’t count. Nope you need to cull 30-40 elk a year and shoot competitively to be a competent long range hunter and someone who can speak on the subject. Right? Ok
The world has established long ago, in many things, that less is often more, that the right kind of practice, gear and prep trumps volume or rabbit holes of prep that go well past the point of diminishing returns.
Now we can boil down methods and gear to this long range hunting since it's properly identified and agreed upon. Now we know the hunting part stops before the limits of the guns/cartridges abilities for the majority. A combination of people abilities(field accuracy), live animal limitations (tof) and field conditions(wind mostly). It's no surprise that there’s a balance, or range, discovered over time. Hard to believe a solo hunting and avid gear junky and shooter could figure this out on his own by research and solo field application.
Now that we have these confirmations, this opens the door to boiling things down further for the hunting prep, gear and practice. Especially so for those who tend to be minimalist in approach and agree that hunting is best done via k.i.s.s. principles.
Not only that we should be able to do this solo, one of the guys in this discussion is solo 98% of the time (well not now as the kids have been doing a bunch of it the past few years…before kids coming of age though I was just a solo warrior when possible), the other guy seems to always be in groups. A lot of the discussion, prep and methods discussed by the guy who ‘does everything’ is a team effort, needing or assuming always a partner around etc. Is that reflective of hunting? No solo guys out there? Nah, rokslide is a place most likely to find solo back country guys. This should be doable on your own, you don’t need a common language or exact same method if you're competent solo. You can boil down a system that works for you, your psychology and preferences.
Case in point on boiling one aspect down in light of us finally agreeing on what long range hunting is; Let’s just look at a wind example real quick; 6.5 Creedmoor 140 eld-m, 4000’ elevation, 10 mph…450 yards 1.1 moa, 0.3 mil, or 5.2”. Again at 600 yards, now at the extreme limit for ideal conditions shooting for majority of hunters…600 yards 1.5 moa, 0.4 mil, 9.5”.
You could dial that in, or use reticle reference, OR use on target reference. We now have confirmation here as it’s been mentioned by others before, that our minds are wired visually and spatially so your auto-pilot in a hunting situation after the first shot will make the reticle hash marks disappear or useless…so that begs the question why start that way in the first place? I mean, if you can’t see 5” or 10” on an animal you’ve been around before then ok, dial it or do a reticle I suppose but anything after the first shot will be done subconsciously by your brain anyway if you see the miss impact. I’ve used reticle reference, and before I even knew or saw confirmation on how our brain worked I figured out quickly afield that the reticle reference goes out the winder after first shot., as confirmed here how our brains are wired. My question is...why train that way? Anyway, I’m a minimalist who boils things down…but also avid gear junky and researcher which means I try, and apply, the methods available.
So what does all this mean in simpler terms? Majority long range hunters will be shooting in the 2’ to 5.5’ holdover range (400-600) which for live animals coincides with ½ to ¾ second time of flights, and again with animals coincides with size of kill zone and typical hunters field accurancy and our desire to have a range of acceptable wiggle room within that(including they may move), then within ~1’ of wind hold which will hold all the way out to 600 as we will know we can still shoot within that with double the wind in the 450 yard range but as we get to 550-600 we will likely be far pickier about being under 10 mph to shoot at an animal or we wait for that condition or get closer. We know that our ability to read wind will only be so accurate so again will stay within acceptable wiggle room limits to make reliable to land in that kill zone.
Holding inches is actually more precise unit of measure than both moa or mil in this real world, a finer unit of measure, not to mention an institutionalized one we can see on target. And since we no longer care what units make more sense from 600 to infinity we can quit fighting over which is best, I can see benefits to moa within certain distances and then mils from there onward, for elrh or prs etc., we can learn to make them all work at the range. This 600 yard outer hunting limit is 1.5 moa, 0.4 mil, 9.5”…dial, reticle, or target reference. You can skin this cat several ways. Elevation no prob, reticle or dial, rangefinder solved that for us long ago and makes getting that right a non-issue and easier than guessing wind to within a few mph or inches on a kill zone.
Glad we finally worked this out once and for all. Now that we have solved all this…maybe the competitive shooting sports guys can give the hunters a discipline that actually mirrors this reality? Ie; Life size targets with kill zone flappers, 0-600 with maybe an 800 yard bonus coyote, 1 shot only to win the atv bonus for fun. That would mirror 3d prep for hunters who like to compete and hunt a lot better than trying to apply prs or f-class before that etc. to long range hunting. They are too far unrelated and far too commonly cross discussed and applied.
Start up an extended long range hunting forum and or competitive shooting forum and you’ll never see me even reading in there as my focus has only ever been hunting and ensuring I was capable to most limits I could find with the gear of the day. And I found em. And they’re the same as Form found. And we did it in different ways, imagine that.
Heck we even went far deeper on terminal ballistics than most and came around to shooting a shat ton less cartridge than the good ole boys can fathom and have similar understandings with our obviously different approach and way to describe it. That was other discussions but we seem to agree on both in flight ballistics related to hunting and terminal ballistics a lot more than we don't or would appear in how we discuss the topics. We just have some personality differences keeping this entertaining.
