Jimbo,
I think your analysis needs to go a bit deeper. Patagonia is known for giving money to groups, including groups that are against "canned" hunts, for example. That doesn't make them anti-hunting. The hunting community as a whole should be less afraid of speaking out against unethical hunts, including hunts that are not fair chase. Just because a thing is legal, doesn't make it right for the future of our kids and the planet. Again, you have to ask whether fostering an "us versus them" attitude is going to be productive in the long run, when such a small percentage of the population hunts.
When the population of planet earth snowballs around 2050, what will the non-hunting populace say about our activities? If we're respectful of people and the planet, then we have a fighting chance.
Companies that got their start in mountaineering, like Patagonia (and many others that make excellent backcountry gear) are pro-environment more than they are anti-hunting. And, not everything embraced by the hunting community is good for the long-term outlook of hunting.
I don't know about you, but I want my grandchildren to have the ability to hunt, fish, backpack, see the milky way shining bright over the mountains. If hunting continues to be so unsustainable, for the most part (i.e. guys hauling massive amounts of gear into the woods, atvs, etc.), then that bright future probably will not be there for our grandkids.
Just my two cents...