CorbLand
WKR
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
- Messages
- 8,068
Well, on the bright side, it only took about 225 years before people started arguing to go back to a system that our country fought a war to break free from.
Teddy Roosevelt is rolling in his grave.Well, on the bright side, it only took about 225 years before people started arguing to go back to a system that our country fought a war to break free from.
Isnt that the statue that was torn down from infront of the natural history museum in NY? I didnt see a whole lot of people in opposition to its removal on Hunttalk. Weird since that statue was one of the most iconic statues in the country and symbolize what TR was about in one of the most visited places in the country. Was he rolling in his grave then?Teddy Roosevelt is rolling in his grave.
I don’t really care about statues. I do care about the North American Model of wildlife management and the public land trust of our national forests and BLM lands.Isnt that the statue that was torn down from infront of the natural history museum in NY? I didnt see a whole lot of people in opposition to its removal on Hunttalk. Weird since that statue was one of the most iconic statues in the country and symbolize what TR was about in one of the most visited places in the country. Was he rolling in his grave then?
Unfortunately our country can’t afford it after 225 years.Well, on the bright side, it only took about 225 years before people started arguing to go back to a system that our country fought a war to break free from.
You sure?Unfortunately our country can’t afford it after 225 years.
Why does the model change due to land ownership changes, states would still manage the wildlife?I don’t really care about statues. I do care about the North American Model of wildlife management and the public land trust of our national forests and BLM lands.
We can afford it. Just have to stop sending all our money to other places.Unfortunately our country can’t afford it after 225 years.
Well look at our federal debt and how many states would fall apart financially without federal aid, last I checked that’s a bankruptcy for anyone else.You sure?
Losing public lands in the west would exponentially drive hunting towards a European model.Why does the model change due to land ownership changes, states would still manage the wildlife?
Maybe but hunting isn’t really anything other then a hobby in today’s world and managed by the greedy, residents and nonresidents both are a big part of that.Losing public lands in the west would exponentially drive hunting towards a European model.
Most states have sold off over 50% of the land they did own and still can’t balance a budget…how would giving them more land to sell solve that?Maybe but hunting isn’t really anything other then a hobby in today’s world and managed by the greedy, residents and nonresidents both are a big part of that.
But if we could sell off some of that land, let states collect property taxes and reduce our debt load and federal aid requirements in reality it would be best for the majority of which hunters are not.
Where do you live? Let's just reverse Louisiana purchase and sell to highest bidder and pay off our debts. Just eminent domain the entire section, hell it's the only way for the government to afford anything.Well look at our federal debt and how many states would fall apart financially without federal aid, last I checked that’s a bankruptcy for anyone else.
Everyone was up in arms when GM was bailed out, well 80% of the states are currently on an annual bail out as well.
Pretty sure they would tax the land they sell, taxes they don’t currently get to collect.Most states have sold off over 50% of the land they did own and still can’t balance a budget…how would giving them more land to sell solve that?
Like giving an alcoholic a bar.
They do own the lands, and so do you.Pretty sure they would tax the land they sell, taxes they don’t currently get to collect.
Yup there will be mismanagement but those of us that don’t live close to big swaths of federal land are tired with all the residents of western states acting like they already own the lands, so I say let’s sell it to the states and let them have it.
Your statement they don’t get to collect taxes is not correct. Both Forest Service and BLM pay PILT to offset loss of property tax revenue. Sometimes PILT can actually be higher than what property taxes would be due to ag exemptions and such.Pretty sure they would tax the land they sell, taxes they don’t currently get to collect.
Not really, as a nonresident if all federal lands went private, it would probably be cheaper to hunt and way easier to get a tag.They do own the lands, and so do you.
Cutting your nose of your spite the face has always been a winning solution.
Ok, I still say sell it to the state and let them manage the land and wildlife, we’ll all sit back and watch.This is not correct.
Payments in Lieu of Taxes | U.S. Department of the Interior
PILT payments help local governments carry out such vital services as firefighting and police protection, construction of public schools and roads, and search-and-rescue operations.www.doi.gov
Texas is your huckleberry then. No need to come to the west.Not really, as a nonresident if all federal lands went private, it would probably be cheaper to hunt and way easier to get a tag.
If utah buys all the federal land bank can they self govern?Ok, I still say sell it to the state and let them manage the land and wildlife, we’ll all sit back and watch.