Utah- what the hell?

Teddy Roosevelt is rolling in his grave.
Isnt that the statue that was torn down from infront of the natural history museum in NY? I didnt see a whole lot of people in opposition to its removal on Hunttalk. Weird since that statue was one of the most iconic statues in the country and symbolize what TR was about in one of the most visited places in the country. Was he rolling in his grave then?
 
Isnt that the statue that was torn down from infront of the natural history museum in NY? I didnt see a whole lot of people in opposition to its removal on Hunttalk. Weird since that statue was one of the most iconic statues in the country and symbolize what TR was about in one of the most visited places in the country. Was he rolling in his grave then?
I don’t really care about statues. I do care about the North American Model of wildlife management and the public land trust of our national forests and BLM lands.
 
You sure?
Well look at our federal debt and how many states would fall apart financially without federal aid, last I checked that’s a bankruptcy for anyone else.

Everyone was up in arms when GM was bailed out, well 80% of the states are currently on an annual bail out as well.
 
Losing public lands in the west would exponentially drive hunting towards a European model.
Maybe but hunting isn’t really anything other then a hobby in today’s world and managed by the greedy, residents and nonresidents both are a big part of that.

But if we could sell off some of that land, let states collect property taxes and reduce our debt load and federal aid requirements in reality it would be best for the majority of which hunters are not the majority.

The majority of residents do not reside where the bulk of federal public lands are, we could sell of 90% of the federal land and all those that go out west a few times in their life would still see the same things and have the same experiences.
 
Maybe but hunting isn’t really anything other then a hobby in today’s world and managed by the greedy, residents and nonresidents both are a big part of that.

But if we could sell off some of that land, let states collect property taxes and reduce our debt load and federal aid requirements in reality it would be best for the majority of which hunters are not.
Most states have sold off over 50% of the land they did own and still can’t balance a budget…how would giving them more land to sell solve that?

Like giving an alcoholic a bar.
 
Well look at our federal debt and how many states would fall apart financially without federal aid, last I checked that’s a bankruptcy for anyone else.

Everyone was up in arms when GM was bailed out, well 80% of the states are currently on an annual bail out as well.
Where do you live? Let's just reverse Louisiana purchase and sell to highest bidder and pay off our debts. Just eminent domain the entire section, hell it's the only way for the government to afford anything.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
 
Most states have sold off over 50% of the land they did own and still can’t balance a budget…how would giving them more land to sell solve that?

Like giving an alcoholic a bar.
Pretty sure they would tax the land they sell, taxes they don’t currently get to collect.

Yup there will be mismanagement but those of us that don’t live close to big swaths of federal land are tired with all the residents of western states acting like they already own the lands, so I say let’s sell it to the states and let them have it. Also why should 90% of Americans tax dollars fund something they don’t have time to utilize? I’m sure most people would prefer to see the funds allocated to something that directly effects the majority.
 
Pretty sure they would tax the land they sell, taxes they don’t currently get to collect.

Yup there will be mismanagement but those of us that don’t live close to big swaths of federal land are tired with all the residents of western states acting like they already own the lands, so I say let’s sell it to the states and let them have it.
They do own the lands, and so do you.

Cutting your nose off to spite the face has always been a winning solution.
 
Pretty sure they would tax the land they sell, taxes they don’t currently get to collect.
Your statement they don’t get to collect taxes is not correct. Both Forest Service and BLM pay PILT to offset loss of property tax revenue. Sometimes PILT can actually be higher than what property taxes would be due to ag exemptions and such.
 
Back
Top