Utah- what the hell?

CJ19

WKR
Joined
Nov 25, 2018
Messages
443
Teddy Roosevelt is rolling in his grave.
Isnt that the statue that was torn down from infront of the natural history museum in NY? I didnt see a whole lot of people in opposition to its removal on Hunttalk. Weird since that statue was one of the most iconic statues in the country and symbolize what TR was about in one of the most visited places in the country. Was he rolling in his grave then?
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
3,596
Location
Somewhere between here and there
Isnt that the statue that was torn down from infront of the natural history museum in NY? I didnt see a whole lot of people in opposition to its removal on Hunttalk. Weird since that statue was one of the most iconic statues in the country and symbolize what TR was about in one of the most visited places in the country. Was he rolling in his grave then?
I don’t really care about statues. I do care about the North American Model of wildlife management and the public land trust of our national forests and BLM lands.
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,965
I don’t really care about statues. I do care about the North American Model of wildlife management and the public land trust of our national forests and BLM lands.
Why does the model change due to land ownership changes, states would still manage the wildlife?
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,965
You sure?
Well look at our federal debt and how many states would fall apart financially without federal aid, last I checked that’s a bankruptcy for anyone else.

Everyone was up in arms when GM was bailed out, well 80% of the states are currently on an annual bail out as well.
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,965
Losing public lands in the west would exponentially drive hunting towards a European model.
Maybe but hunting isn’t really anything other then a hobby in today’s world and managed by the greedy, residents and nonresidents both are a big part of that.

But if we could sell off some of that land, let states collect property taxes and reduce our debt load and federal aid requirements in reality it would be best for the majority of which hunters are not the majority.

The majority of residents do not reside where the bulk of federal public lands are, we could sell of 90% of the federal land and all those that go out west a few times in their life would still see the same things and have the same experiences.
 

CorbLand

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
8,068
Maybe but hunting isn’t really anything other then a hobby in today’s world and managed by the greedy, residents and nonresidents both are a big part of that.

But if we could sell off some of that land, let states collect property taxes and reduce our debt load and federal aid requirements in reality it would be best for the majority of which hunters are not.
Most states have sold off over 50% of the land they did own and still can’t balance a budget…how would giving them more land to sell solve that?

Like giving an alcoholic a bar.
 

realunlucky

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
13,185
Location
Eastern Utah
Well look at our federal debt and how many states would fall apart financially without federal aid, last I checked that’s a bankruptcy for anyone else.

Everyone was up in arms when GM was bailed out, well 80% of the states are currently on an annual bail out as well.
Where do you live? Let's just reverse Louisiana purchase and sell to highest bidder and pay off our debts. Just eminent domain the entire section, hell it's the only way for the government to afford anything.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,965
Most states have sold off over 50% of the land they did own and still can’t balance a budget…how would giving them more land to sell solve that?

Like giving an alcoholic a bar.
Pretty sure they would tax the land they sell, taxes they don’t currently get to collect.

Yup there will be mismanagement but those of us that don’t live close to big swaths of federal land are tired with all the residents of western states acting like they already own the lands, so I say let’s sell it to the states and let them have it. Also why should 90% of Americans tax dollars fund something they don’t have time to utilize? I’m sure most people would prefer to see the funds allocated to something that directly effects the majority.
 

CorbLand

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
8,068
Pretty sure they would tax the land they sell, taxes they don’t currently get to collect.

Yup there will be mismanagement but those of us that don’t live close to big swaths of federal land are tired with all the residents of western states acting like they already own the lands, so I say let’s sell it to the states and let them have it.
They do own the lands, and so do you.

Cutting your nose off to spite the face has always been a winning solution.
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
3,596
Location
Somewhere between here and there
Pretty sure they would tax the land they sell, taxes they don’t currently get to collect.
Your statement they don’t get to collect taxes is not correct. Both Forest Service and BLM pay PILT to offset loss of property tax revenue. Sometimes PILT can actually be higher than what property taxes would be due to ag exemptions and such.
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,965
They do own the lands, and so do you.

Cutting your nose of your spite the face has always been a winning solution.
Not really, as a nonresident if all federal lands went private, it would probably be cheaper to hunt and way easier to get a tag.
 

tdhanses

WKR
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
5,965
Top