UM Tikka Rings vs….

[nobody]

Now this is a good point. Why on rockslide is the maven considered like gold? I must’ve missed where the maven is top of the heap now.

Maven RS1.2 2.5-15x44mm Field Eval

This is a field evaluation of the Maven RS1.2 2.5-15x44mm SHR-Mil reticle scope. This scope was given to me by Ryan. The baseline 30 round group with this lot of ammunition was 1.5” at 100 yards. The scope and weight- Turrets: Elevation turret is exposed, revolution indicated, 10...

rokslide.com

Short answer: zero retention matters.

 

[Schmo]

The UM rings are solid! If mounting on a pic rail, then my choice is ARC M-Brace rings.

 

[peaceful_ruler]

Nearly identical option for less cash and a slightly lower mount in 30mm? Sportsmatch T084…good to a 44mm obj on the factory lite barrels.

 

[False_Cast]

Agree with the above. Compared to UM lows, T084 are lighter, a bit cheaper, mount the scope slightly lower and have a great/equal track record from what I’ve read. I’ve had both and much prefer the UM/Sportsmatch direct mount to a rail. Fewer fasteners to (possibly) fail, definitely lower (for factory stock purposes) and both have a recoil pin.

I’d say it’s a toss up between UM and Sportsmatch depending on your priorities but I’d take both over a rail setup.

 

[nksmfamjp]

Maven RS1.2 2.5-15x44mm Field Eval

This is a field evaluation of the Maven RS1.2 2.5-15x44mm SHR-Mil reticle scope. This scope was given to me by Ryan. The baseline 30 round group with this lot of ammunition was 1.5” at 100 yards. The scope and weight- Turrets: Elevation turret is exposed, revolution indicated, 10...

rokslide.com

Short answer: zero retention matters.

Thanks for the link to the field evaluation. This form approved thing really seems to sell stuff. I hope he’s getting a cut of everything he’s bumping.

 

[nobody]

Thanks for the link to the field evaluation. This form approved thing really seems to sell stuff. I hope he’s getting a cut of everything he’s bumping.

Nope, what helps things sell is when they perform as they should. A Toyota Corolla isn’t popular because it’s cool, it’s popular because it just flat works. Scopes that work sell, it’s the reason SWFA has such a great following.

 

[False_Cast]

Thanks for the link to the field evaluation. This form approved thing really seems to sell stuff. I hope he’s getting a cut of everything he’s bumping.

There’s a difference between marketing and unbiased demonstrations revealing what works well/what doesn’t.

 

[Marbles]

The UM rings are nice. Compared to the Sportsmatch the UM rings have more recoil pin options (so better placement options), and nitrided screws (so no rust). The Sportsmatch are lighter, lower, and cheaper for something that does the job equally well.

I like my UM rings more than my Sportsmatch.

But, I don't like moving a scope from one Tikka to another with the UM rings. You cannot put the scope on a non-T3/T3x without putting the rings. For me, this has been enough that I'm switching over to glued on pic rails and NF UL rings. This is the most expensive approach.

For scope hight above bore (center bore to optical center)
-Sportsmatch T084 1.59 inches
-UM lows 1.65 inches
-NF UL lows (on Area419 20 MOA rail) 1.69 inches

 

[amassi]

The UM rings are nice. Compared to the Sportsmatch the UM rings have more recoil pin options (so better placement options), and nitrided screws (so no rust). The Sportsmatch are lighter, lower, and cheaper for something that does the job equally well.

I like my UM rings more than my Sportsmatch.

But, I don't like moving a scope from one Tikka to another with the UM rings. You cannot put the scope on a non-T3/T3x without putting the rings. For me, this has been enough that I'm switching over to glued on pic rails and NF UL rings. This is the most expensive approach.

For scope hight above bore (center bore to optical center)
-Sportsmatch T084 1.59 inches
-UM lows 1.65 inches
-NF UL lows (on Area419 20 MOA rail) 1.69 inches

I forget who but someone sells a tikka pic rail that has a recoil lug
If your gonna be bonding them might as well have another point of contact


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk