UM Hinged Scope Rings

Juan_ID

WKR
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
1,648
Location
Idaho
I figure there’s some scientific engineering behind it but what’s the reason for the offset screw holes?
 

Juan_ID

WKR
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
1,648
Location
Idaho
Not sure what you mean by offset holes. You mean why at the top? And a hinge pin?
Most scope rings are “clamp” like this, the rings in this post are oriented like the red line.
 

Attachments

  • C847F825-9945-4121-83B0-74C233D65F74.jpeg
    C847F825-9945-4121-83B0-74C233D65F74.jpeg
    102 KB · Views: 45
OP
Ryan Avery

Ryan Avery

Admin
Staff member
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
8,969
2ca716d926d077616366a4387f181753.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

Unknown Munitions

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Dec 17, 2019
Messages
505
Location
Post Falls, ID
Well .... I got all excited, then checked the webpage to see that the highest option will only be 1.25" ...

I'm in the camp of modern positional/field shooting, where 38 mm / 1.5" - maaaybe 25 mm / 1.38" - is the way to go.

@Unknown Munitions: any chance of higher rings in the future?
Yes, we will release 1.5” versions in 30, 34, and 35 next.
 

Flyjunky

WKR
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
1,427
@Unknown Munitions

I wanted to bring this back up and see the expected ship times? In post #50 I have that exact scope and a machined 2 piece rail on my ruckus action with a carbon barrel which I'm sure is very close to what the pic shows above. What height rings would you suggest? Lows?

If I order a set I'm sure you could Cerakote them as well?
 

amassi

WKR
Joined
May 26, 2018
Messages
3,920
c56dee7d806e8bb54a49830d4df35971.jpg



The Tikka version that uses the Tikka rail is coming soon!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Any eta on the tikka version ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Overwire

FNG
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
60
It’s just how the design ended up, maximizing strength and holding force, and making them light. It’s the equivalent of 6 screw rings but the weight of 4 screw rings.

Not exactly. It would be the equivalent of 6 ring screws if you ignore the effect of friction when clamping but if you account for friction it will be less then 6 (but still likely more than 4). For instance, if one were to assume a coefficient of friction of .3 between the rings and scope tube (just a wild guess) then this design would be equivalent to about 4.6 ring screws.

Also note that by removing material in the middle of the ring you are reducing surface area which will increase contact stress on the scope tube at any given clamping force. Since you are (most likely) increasing clamping force compared to a traditional 4 screw design but appear to have similar SA to a traditional 4 screw design you are potentially adding a bit more stress into the scope tube which might be problematic for some manufacturers unless you reduce ring torque slightly.
 
Top