Ultralight Ultralight Rifles

robtattoo

WKR
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
3,559
Location
Tullahoma, TN
By all means, get a receiver rod. Or, someone here will let you borrow one. They'll all fit the SOLO upper.

That said, for straight-pull builds, I've never had an issue with just going hand tight with the barrel nut or using a strap wrench to go just beyond that.

2 pieces of 3x2 clamping top & bottom of the receiver in a machine vice.
That's all I've used in about 25 AR builds. Never had a barrel nut back off yet.
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Messages
755
Location
Wyoming
There are many advantages to a reaction rod for upper receivers. They slide through the upper and lock into the steel barrel extension, enabling you to rotate the upper to work on the sides, bottom, and top without ever stressing the aluminum receiver.

Trust me, if you do frequent AR work, they pay for themselves. Since getting one, I’ve never used a clamshell or anything else and never will.
 
OP
T

Thegman

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
812
2 pieces of 3x2 clamping top & bottom of the receiver in a machine vice.
That's all I've used in about 25 AR builds. Never had a barrel nut back off yet.
There are many advantages to a reaction rod for upper receivers. They slide through the upper and lock into the steel barrel extension, enabling you to rotate the upper to work on the sides, bottom, and top without ever stressing the aluminum receiver.

Trust me, if you do frequent AR work, they pay for themselves. Since getting one, I’ve never used a clamshell or anything else and never will.
Remember though, this is the robtattoo we're talking to here, he's special...in a good way!
 

Luke S

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jul 7, 2019
Messages
276
Well my upper arrived so I put together what I have on an aluminum lower.
20241204_174326.jpg
The blue tape is to let me know if gas is leaking out of the reversed gas port. I carved the hand grip down a bit as an experiment. Next time I won't go quit as short but it's okay. I can't find a scale right now but it's definitely lighter than anything I have in the house. When I swap in the polyester lower and ditch the aluminum handguard I can lose a bit more.
This is basically what I wanted as a backpacking "rifle." We can shoot grouse with light handloads and it should have enough power for big game out to 250 yards. All while being comact and light enough to carry on trips where I'd probably leave a normal rifle behind. Next step is a lighter barrel possible in a rifle length.
 
OP
T

Thegman

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
812
Well my upper arrived so I put together what I have on an aluminum lower.
View attachment 801449
The blue tape is to let me know if gas is leaking out of the reversed gas port. I carved the hand grip down a bit as an experiment. Next time I won't go quit as short but it's okay. I can't find a scale right now but it's definitely lighter than anything I have in the house. When I swap in the polyester lower and ditch the aluminum handguard I can lose a bit more.
This is basically what I wanted as a backpacking "rifle." We can shoot grouse with light handloads and it should have enough power for big game out to 250 yards. All while being comact and light enough to carry on trips where I'd probably leave a normal rifle behind. Next step is a lighter barrel possible in a rifle length.
What chambering? A BO or 5.56?
 

Luke S

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jul 7, 2019
Messages
276
It's a genetic 7.5 inch barrel that we had lying around. The suppressor is a Polonium 30. According to the bathroom scale the whole package with a poly lower is 5 pounds. That means roughly 3.5 pounds for the bare gun. Not sure that is totally accurate until I get a more precise scale. But definitely moving in the right direction.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
313
Is the solo 300 charging handle 10 x 32 treads Thanks
I think so. I used a 5mm thread checker the other day to make sure I didn't ding up the threads doing some tinkering and Google says 5mm and 10-32 are basically indistinguishable.
 

goalie

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 22, 2020
Messages
200
Location
Midwest
Well my upper arrived so I put together what I have on an aluminum lower.
View attachment 801449
The blue tape is to let me know if gas is leaking out of the reversed gas port. I carved the hand grip down a bit as an experiment. Next time I won't go quit as short but it's okay. I can't find a scale right now but it's definitely lighter than anything I have in the house. When I swap in the polyester lower and ditch the aluminum handguard I can lose a bit more.
This is basically what I wanted as a backpacking "rifle." We can shoot grouse with light handloads and it should have enough power for big game out to 250 yards. All while being comact and light enough to carry on trips where I'd probably leave a normal rifle behind. Next step is a lighter barrel possible in a rifle length.
Where are you at? I ordered mine minutes after they were available (I was on the notification list) and USPS has been messing with me ever since. I'm all of 20 miles from Eagan MN where they ship from, and if tracking is correct, after two trips back and forth from St Paul to MPLS it's finally at my local post office for delivery today. :rolleyes:
 

KyleR1985

WKR
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
693
If anyone is a member on the 6ARC forums, might be worth reaching out to this guy to see how this has gone since.

IMG_4883.jpeg
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
855
Location
Idaho
I'll post this here... because I feel like ya'll will understand... I get asked by friends and family why I care so much about setting up an "ultralight" rifle...

This will be at least part of my answer from now on.

Two rifles, both shooting a 6mm projectile with virtually identical powder, recoil, etc. Both weigh about the same (the simple setup actually weighs 2oz more). But, if I hand both rifles to a novice shooter, they can accurately hit targets (with minimal instruction) 2-3 times as far out with the full setup than with the simple setup. In the end... starting with a lighter weight base rifle, I get more accuracy enhancing features for the same final weight.

Rifle 1: 114.7oz
Tikka T3x Superlite 243win
Simmons 3x9 scope


Rifle 2: 112.7oz
Custom Rem700sa clone, 6mmCM
Nightforce NXS 2.5-10x42
Scope caps
TBAC Ultra7 suppressor
Vertical grip
Folding stock
Adjustable cheek riser
Spare ammo holder
Tripod
 

Attachments

  • 20241204_230011.jpg
    20241204_230011.jpg
    280.7 KB · Views: 38
  • 20241204_230243.jpg
    20241204_230243.jpg
    275 KB · Views: 38
OP
T

Thegman

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
812
I'll post this here... because I feel like ya'll will understand... I get asked by friends and family why I care so much about setting up an "ultralight" rifle...

This will be at least part of my answer from now on.

Two rifles, both shooting a 6mm projectile with virtually identical powder, recoil, etc. Both weigh about the same (the simple setup actually weighs 2oz more). But, if I hand both rifles to a novice shooter, they can accurately hit targets (with minimal instruction) 2-3 times as far out with the full setup than with the simple setup. In the end... starting with a lighter weight base rifle, I get more accuracy enhancing features for the same final weight.

Rifle 1: 114.7oz
Tikka T3x Superlite 243win
Simmons 3x9 scope


Rifle 2: 112.7oz
Custom Rem700sa clone, 6mmCM
Nightforce NXS 2.5-10x42
Scope caps
TBAC Ultra7 suppressor
Vertical grip
Folding stock
Adjustable cheek riser
Spare ammo holder
Tripod
Those are good points. I've found people that have tried both are much more likely to end up like this.
20241031_202532.jpg

Hard to explain to someone with no experience with them, but once people have carried both UL-UL rifles, and "normal" rifles, the light bulb is much more likely to switch on.
 

KyleR1985

WKR
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
693
Someone may have posted this already.

7.7oz for right side charging upper receiver. Option for rear.



For reference the BCA weighs 10oz.


I suspect you could build a side charging upper that weighs same as solo, for around the same price, with aluminum bcg. If you wanted right side charging or to DIY.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4886.jpeg
    IMG_4886.jpeg
    203.9 KB · Views: 18
Top