*zap*
WKR
some folks just have fascinating opinions.....
100% agreeI wish there were *more* restrictions on ATV’s and UTV’s and I haven’t been on a horse since I broke my arm (for the second time) on dads barrel racing horse I wasn’t supposed to be riding in the fourth grade.
Keep wild places wild. There is nothing more out of place and disheartening than being in the middle of nowhere, miles from a road and having a quasi biker gang of overweight suburbanites come screaming around the bend on their expensive go-carts.
Mountain bike? Cool
Horses and mules? Cool
E-bikes? Yeah alright
Motorized vehicles? Negative. Ride them on the national forest roads with the cars if you really want to get them out of the culdesac.
Just my opinion.
Not everyone that grows up in family with horses automatically hunts on horseback. An outfitter’s son I know is plenty happy to avoid horse hassles, and hunts areas horses can’t access. I park next to a lot of horse hunters, but it makes no sense hunting next to them.Not at all! It was a great learning experience and I look forward to going back next year.
It amazes me how entitled some residents are here on this forum. Heaven forbid someone show up with a different point of view or point out where people have used the system to give themselves an unreasonable advantage. It's certainly not all of them, but if you're not one of them you know who I'm talking about. If you don't then you're probably who I'm talking about.
Every one of those is a straw man argument. You are missing the logic. There has to be rules. We have to agree on the rules and to a large extent we have agreed on them which is why we have some trails that you get to use your motorized vehicle on for 9 months (or 6 or what have you) of the year but not during hunting season. That is fair. “Wild” in the modern world is a relative definition. True Wild excludes man entirely and it may get to that someday, but for now horses are animals, as is a man on foot and as such is much less of an impact on game. Once again, it’s not about you and what you think your rights are, it’s about how best to manage the interest of the game with the interests of man. It really isn’t a leap. There are plenty of places to do what you want to do. If it makes you feel better, I’m a really fit dude backcountry telemark skiing and mountain biking and hiking and hunting during muzzleloader, duck (mountain duck hunting) first rifle, second rifle and this year fourth rifle, all weekly year round and even I don’t hike or backpack in more that a few miles off trail or road (I try to avoid trails during hunting season) in the Colorado mountains. Its really hard work. Anymore it is a feat to get away from people in the mountains into truly wild country. The place is over run with people. So again, let some places be.Replace side by side with horses and your statement is equally true.
It is a big leap. Everything else is fair. If horses aren't native to the area they should be banned too.
Not at all! It was a great learning experience and I look forward to going back next year.
It amazes me how entitled some residents are here on this forum. Heaven forbid someone show up with a different point of view or point out where people have used the system to give themselves an unreasonable advantage. It's certainly not all of them, but if you're not one of them you know who I'm talking about. If you don't then you're probably who I'm talking about.
Actually 250 is way too far of a benchmark. I want to see a pre season shooting test implemented, and if you pass the test, then you shouldn't be allowed to hunt. Just because I choose to stay home and chug beer all year, why should some guy who practices have an advantage over me?Don’t even get me started on those sniper wannabes at the range every weekend shooting their rifle when I’m at the golf course.
It would be a lot more fair if you couldn’t legally shoot animals past 250 yards. /s
Just because I choose to stay home and chug beer all year
Just for funsies, is “wild” truly the absence of man? Or is it the absence of technology? Should we take wilderness restrictions back to atlatls and recurves?“Wild” in the modern world is a relative definition. True Wild excludes man entirely and it may get to that someday, but for now horses are animals, as is a man on foot and as such is much less of an impact on game. Once again, it’s not about you and what you think your rights are, it’s about how best to manage the interest of the game with the interests of man. It really isn’t a leap.
The game has rules. Some folks master the game, others fuss about the game.Don't hate the player.. Hate the game.
Good questions. Probably absence of technology. No we shouldn’t take it back to atlatls and recurves. There is a happy medium in there somewhere…not for everyone but for most. The thing is, everything touched my man seems to require management of some sort. We are a menace to the natural world.Just for funsies, is “wild” truly the absence of man? Or is it the absence of technology? Should we take wilderness restrictions back to atlatls and recurves?
Based on some recent discoveries, it’s looking like man has been on this continent for 15,000+ years. I think it was wild when man existed.
Not at all disagreeing with your thoughts on impact of man on animals these days. I’m just trying to make a decent conversation out of this cess pool of complaining.