The Rokslide 95 (Ruger American 😁)

[huntsman22]

uhh, max spacing, maybe?

 

[goalie]

What advantage you do think is being missed ?

In general, the farther apart you can get the rings the better. Your's are not up on the turrets, and are "fine" but not as widely spaced as they could be

 

[Scottyboy]

In general, the farther apart you can get the rings the better. Your's are not up on the turrets, and are "fine" but not as widely spaced as they could be

Or are they? Can you please post a pic of your scopes please

 

[grfox92]

What advantage you do think is being missed ?

Looks like you could move the front ring to the very furthest forward slot on the pic rail and can probably move the rear ring to the second to last slot on the rear of the Pic rail.

If that set up is completely properly mounted, decreased and loctite I wouldn't change anything now, it will be fine. But typically you want your rings spaced the maximum amount.

Sent from my SM-S931U using Tapatalk

 

[goalie]

Or are they? Can you please post a pic of your scopes please

Previous page of this thread for mine.

The front ring is as far forward as possible for my eye relief, the rear ring is on the furthest back part of the rail without hanging over a little (wide rings)

 

[The Guide]

Bolt fluting won’t make it worse, make it better? Who knows who cares, again it’s only an improvement. What’s your issue with the ring spacing?

General, the further you are from the electoral while maintaining your eye relief has a lower chance for damage to the scope and more reliable dialing due to not compressing the springs that hold the inner tubes in place.

Jay

 

[goalie]

not your eye relief

To be clear, nobody is saying move the scope position. It just looks your rings could have both been one slot further from center without changing the scope position.

And neither ring is anywhere near your turrets, which is good.

 

[huntsman22]

 

[grfox92]

How has that Arken done for you? I practice PRS with a guy who has had 5 of them for a long time. He says none of them have ever lost zero.

Sent from my SM-S931U using Tapatalk

 

[huntsman22]

Here is a tutorial link from a guy that is highly respected around here. Note number 6). Now read that again. It really is a 'thing'.......

Thread 'Scope mounting to maintain zero'

Sep 29, 2017

After multiple requests for an explanation of how to mount a scope in order to have the lowest possibility of loss of zero, a discussion of a scope mounting video, and the latest thread about scope bases and action screw coming loose, I took some pics of what I do with a rifle when I get it and how I mount scopes (or anything with screws).

To start- a bit of background of why I say what I say.

I am a backpack hunter. What I write below is tailored to hunting.

Having sid that, I work at a place that fires a lot of ammo. I see over half a million rounds a year on average get fired...

• Formidilosus
• Replies: 257
• Forum: Firearms

• 

 

[huntsman22]

How has that Arken done for you? I practice PRS with a guy who has had 5 of them for a long time. He says none of them have ever lost zero.

I only have 8 of them, but they've been good. Boogers dial like they have eyes.

 

[goalie]

But what about the drop test?

Not all rifles are set up for backcountry hard use mountain hunting, and not everyone limits their choices to only "drop test approved" scopes.

There's obviously no downside if you do, but my personal favorite scope (Athlon Helos gen2 2-12x) isn't drop test approved and several have served me well.

Same for the Arken LH4 4-16x scopes. I have three and all track like they're on rails. Perfect for a 22lr or something like my 5.56 Ranch "trainer."

 

[goalie]

Yea, that was more of a joke than anything.

It's hard to tell sometimes.

 

[huntsman22]

If a guy is wanting a drop tested scope, he ain't looking at cheap chineesey arkens to start with.....

 

[BLJ]

I only have 8 of them, but they've been good. Boogers dial like they have eyes.

2 of them here with the same results.

 

[goalie]

They punch WASAAAAY above their pay grade, that's for sure.

 

[BigEd36]

Here is a tutorial link from a guy that is highly respected around here. Note number 6). Now read that again. It really is a 'thing'.......

Thread 'Scope mounting to maintain zero'

Sep 29, 2017

After multiple requests for an explanation of how to mount a scope in order to have the lowest possibility of loss of zero, a discussion of a scope mounting video, and the latest thread about scope bases and action screw coming loose, I took some pics of what I do with a rifle when I get it and how I mount scopes (or anything with screws).

To start- a bit of background of why I say what I say.

I am a backpack hunter. What I write below is tailored to hunting.

Having sid that, I work at a place that fires a lot of ammo. I see over half a million rounds a year on average get fired...

• Formidilosus
• Replies: 257
• Forum: Firearms

• 

Wish I had seen this a week and a half sooner. 2 weeks ago our new Rokslide 95 "twins" arrived (Ruger American Gen 2 Predator 6mm ARC), 1 for Kathy (my wife) and 1 for myself. I took my time mounting scopes, trying to do it the best I could. Using Acetone, I degreased the action, the picatinny rail, the rings, and all the screws. Mounted the rail back to the action using purple thread locker on the screws, torqued them down in 2 steps with a Wheeler FAT Wrench. The instructions that came with the scope and rings said not to use thread locker on those screws. The rings to rail screws had what looked like blue thread locker on them, so I torqued them to the specified torque, again in 2 steps, with the FAT Wrench. Lined up the scope rings the way a gunshop owner told me to do years ago, keeping the rings centered as much as possible between the turrets and the objective and ocular bells. Again, torqued the rings in 2 steps, with the FAT Wrench. Kept the gaps as even as I could tell. This is the mounting for my scope, the wife's is mounted 1 notch further to the rear of rail with the ring locations pretty much identical on the scope. Now I learn that I would have been better to have spaced them wider if possible. I got my rifle out of the safe tonight, I don't think there's quite enough space to move the rear ring back but I think I could have moved the front ring forward a notch.



Seems I'm learning this a little late. Most of the scopes I've mounted have been on 2 piece bases that never left much of any option on ring spacing, only have a few rifles with picatinny rails.

 

[BLJ]

As far as ring spacing goes, I would use it as is. IMO.

 

[Q_Sertorius]

As far as ring spacing goes, I would use it as is. IMO.

Agreed. I would not sweat it.

 

[zdc1775]

Not all rifles are set up for backcountry hard use mountain hunting, and not everyone limits their choices to only "drop test approved" scopes.

There's obviously no downside if you do, but my personal favorite scope (Athlon Helos gen2 2-12x) isn't drop test approved and several have served me well.

Same for the Arken LH4 4-16x scopes. I have three and all track like they're on rails. Perfect for a 22lr or something like my 5.56 Ranch "trainer."

I've been looking at that Athlon for a psuedo MK12 Mod H build I'm doing. How do you like that reticle, especially in the low end of the range?