Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The poor man's precision rifle doesn't suck.
The only issue after one range session is that the bolt doesn't want to close on an empty Pmag. Zero issues with aluminum GI mags or Lancers, and I have a bunch of 10 round Lancers.
View attachment 967641
Same.P Mag is the only one Iāve had issues with.
I used Lancers today, and will try and snag a few of the "flush fit" Duramags if they become available.Same.
I greatly prefer Lancer and DuraMag in mine

I saw that. Maybe a couple weeks ago.
A budget line for the budget line. Ruger gets me.![]()

Glamour shot of the new "Poor Man's Precision" rifle.
View attachment 968135
It sounds great with my Polonium on it, and I'm re-thinking replacing the stock. OEM appears more than adequate for intended use.
Huntsman is a bad influence though, and it will get a Jard trigger. I'm going to wait until I can try the Duramag flush fit magazines before thinking about converting to AICS.
It was a little front-heavy, but easy to shoot offhand even with the bipod. Not nearly a big enough issue to buy the stock weight kit.Looks good, how does it balance out with the suppressor?

Bolt fluting wonāt make it worse, make it better? Who knows who cares, again itās only an improvement. Whatās your issue with the ring spacing?How will fluting the bolt help with feeding? Is there a reason for not maxing out the ring spacing?
What advantage you do think is being missed ?not my rifle, not my issue..... just curious why guys don't take advantage of having a rail.....
Because you are right, itās not your rifle, not your eye relief or really anything. But what bother you about what works for me?not my rifle, not my issue..... just curious why guys don't take advantage of having a rail.....