- Banned
- #961
Newtosavage
WKR
Like most difficult problems, the solution will be multi-faceted and will only reduce the risk. With so many guns in our culture now, there will never be any going back. We've chosen our own fate.Yea I can imagine the level of anxiety you and your wife must be going through. I have a 2 year old so its starting to run through my mind daily. Our thoughts are getting her in a school that is safer with armed security or teachers or doing a joining a hippie compound where every parent pitches in one day a week teaching a smaller group of kids.
What are you wishing to be done to keep your wife and kids safe?
Unrelated, maybe not popular. But I think 18 -21 age should remain legal to purchase pistols, shotguns, bolt actions. Then 25 for the semi auto AR's of the world. Couple with that with better system for background checks and that should help mitigate school shootings.
I agree with you on the "why" schools are targeted but also would add these places are also gun free safe zones that these lunatics know they can get away with a killing spree.
Safer campuses through better design and more SRO's would be part of it. But so many communities think those things are a waste of money (meanwhile they sink millions into football stadiums). Requiring mental health screenings and proficiency testing along with a waiting period that looks something like what we have now for suppressors would be another step in the right direction. Requiring that responsible adults accept legal liability for a young person who possesses firearms would be another. Just like co-signing on a home or car loan. That could be done. Plenty of parents, uncles, people in the community could vouch for a young person. If they aren't willing to sign for them, then maybe there is a problem we all need to know about.
But the way we do school needs to change too. These kids (and some adults) are going back and shooting up schools for a reason. Because the worst experiences of their lives came from that place or a place like it. Many of them are seeking revenge for being cast out by the "cool kids" etc. when they were young. A better public education system that took care of the whole child and not just taught to the test and allowed cliques to form would help prevent some of these things too.
Giving teachers the ability to flag students so SRO's can investigate whether they have access to a firearm in their home situation would help as well.
And yes, taking away high capacity magazines is needed. Just because someone wants to play doomsday prepper or get their jollies off by blasting up a range is not enough reason for civilians to have high capacity magazines. Sportsmen and women can do all they need to do with reasonable capacity magazines. Exceptions could be granted for certain situations - again like applying for class 3 firearms or suppressors. But an individual not known to any dealer should not have access to high capacity magazines.
Again there are lots of things we can actually do if these things bother us as much as we claim they do.
Last edited: