Important distinction to be aware of:If this is true, what is the use case for the 3-15x?
The reticle lines on the 3-9 are measurably thicker and more bold than the 3-15.
The reticle line weight/thickness for the 3-9 is exactly the same as the 6x.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Important distinction to be aware of:If this is true, what is the use case for the 3-15x?
Thank you3-9x without hesitation.
Rokscope is what the S2H crew in working on. And that’s the scope in the thread.I wondered about the Kenton turrets, too. And also, what is the Rokscope? I haven't heard of it. Is it what is discussed in this post? https://rokslide.com/forums/threads/would-you-buy-this-scope.373983/ I haven't dug through the whole thing. Is there a price point?
YesI wondered about the Kenton turrets, too. And also, what is the Rokscope? I haven't heard of it. Is it what is discussed in this post? https://rokslide.com/forums/threads/would-you-buy-this-scope.373983/ I haven't dug through the whole thing. Is there a price point?
Great.....so I should have just bought the 3-9x for $499 instead of that Minox for $2k? Now you tell me.it’s just that the 3-9x has no equal on the market at any price.
A long long time ago, in a land pre covid, Form talked me into a 3-9 SWFA. I've had several since then and still have one now, though its currently not on a rifle. For the weight its still the best bang for the buck especially so at $499 on sale.No formal eval on the 3-9x as it is one of the most proven scopes made so I haven’t spent the time on it.
The thick outer posts are the same, the inner reticle is slightly (.01 mil) thicker.