RokStok

[regulator795]

Vortex defender caps. The front is 44mm, a touch larger than the 6x42. Still works, just not as perfect of a fit as the back cover… i like that it taunts my OCD and shows it who’s boss.

When they inevitably break like every other flip cap, at least they are warrantied.

They do add a bit of black shadow around the scope view. Which I don’t like on scopes that have a solid edge to edge image, but the 6x42 does not have that attribute, so it’s barely noticeable.

I can vouch for the warranty. They sent me a replacement cap when the rubber on my original wore out.

 

[Swamper]

To everyone waiting- hold strong. It will be worth it.

 

[NSI]

To everyone waiting- hold strong. It will be worth it.
View attachment 759232

Great looking RSSSSSS.

Order date if you don’t mind?

-J

 

[fwafwow]

To everyone waiting- hold strong. It will be worth it.
View attachment 759232

Nice! Are those spacers?

 

[Swamper]

Great looking RSSSSSS.

Order date if you don’t mind?

-J

Thank you!

12/22 order, single color

 

[yeti12]

Third stock. Color C-111
View attachment 746775

There appears to be spacers here

@fwafwow

 

[Swamper]

Nice! Are those spacers?

Yes- came with them installed. 14in LOP

 

[Tikka300wsm]

To everyone waiting- hold strong. It will be worth it.
View attachment 759232

Medium rings?

 

[Swamper]

Medium rings?

Yes, medium rings. They are fine. Not “perfect” I don’t think for me. Have a set of lows that I will try eventually. But fine and shootable for 4 other people who shot it with the mediums.

 

[swavescatter]

Thank you!

12/22 order, single color

FML

I was told my railed Rokstok has been at UM since 8/16. Bare carbon so it must have been a QC issue or they’re just not going in order at all.

 

[yeti12]

FML

I was told my railed Rokstok has been at UM since 8/16. Bare carbon so it must have been a QC issue or they’re just not going in order at all.

What was your order date?

 

[swavescatter]

What was your order date?

12/21. Day one. No changes.

 

[yeti12]

12/21. Day one. No changes.

I believe there was a pic rail bare carbon tikka stock with spacers in this thread ordered 12/26 and it arrived 8/6.

Was your rail a pic rail?

 

[Hill Difficulty]

Considering the absence of 700 input, here's a quick summary of my 700 medium RokStok. Am curious whether other 700 owners have better or similar outcomes (see tang description).

Specs:

• 700 medium w/#5 Benchmark, Spartan adapter, M5 bottom metal inlet, 2 flush cups
• Ordered 12/21, arrived 8/31

Observations:

• I like the stock more than expected! Will buy another in 700 SA once the production issues and bugs are worked out.
• Low ring height better than medium (in my case).
• Stock is lightweight/lighter than expected.
• Definitely NOT a drop-in. I'll have to do some relief work, add pillars, and glass-bed the receiver to level out the receiver teetering forward and keeping the ejection port cut aligned.
• Barrel channel and bolt inlets are nicely done.
• The M5 inlet is TIGHT! I hammered it in with a rubber masonry mallet.
• Receiver tang area is goofy/weird, but fixable.
• Don't expect Manners or McMillan fit/finish if not painted.

Pics - stock with barrel action


Barrel inlet - pleased, no issues



Tang - inletting stops 1/8" too short, tang is longer than inlet


Inlet for tang is odd/unusually steep and deep, will require extending tang area shape and bedding the entire action



M5 bottom metal reveal - bottom of metal extends 1/8" around actions screw holes, end to end

 

[swavescatter]

I believe there was a pic rail bare carbon tikka stock with spacers in this thread ordered 12/26 and it arrived 8/6.

Was your rail a pic rail?

Arca rail. Sendero contour.

 

[RyanT26]

Considering the absence of 700 input, here's a quick summary of my 700 medium RokStok. Am curious whether other 700 owners have better or similar outcomes (see tang description).

Specs:

• 700 medium w/#5 Benchmark, Spartan adapter, M5 bottom metal inlet, 2 flush cups
• Ordered 12/21, arrived 8/31

Observations:

• I like the stock more than expected! Will buy another in 700 SA once the production issues and bugs are worked out.
• Low ring height better than medium (in my case).
• Stock is lightweight/lighter than expected.
• Definitely NOT a drop-in. I'll have to do some relief work, add pillars, and glass-bed the receiver to level out the receiver teetering forward and keeping the ejection port cut aligned.
• Barrel channel and bolt inlets are nicely done.
• The M5 inlet is TIGHT! I hammered it in with a rubber masonry mallet.
• Receiver tang area is goofy/weird, but fixable.
• Don't expect Manners or McMillan fit/finish if not painted.

Pics - stock with barrel action
View attachment 759400

Barrel inlet - pleased, no issues
View attachment 759401


Tang - inletting stops 1/8" too short, tang is longer than inlet
View attachment 759403

Inlet for tang is odd/unusually steep and deep, will require extending tang area shape and bedding the entire action
View attachment 759405


M5 bottom metal reveal - bottom of metal extends 1/8" around actions screw holes, end to end
View attachment 759404

Yikes, my dude. Hopefully they get the 700 inlet figured out.

 

[eoperator]

Considering the absence of 700 input, here's a quick summary of my 700 medium RokStok. Am curious whether other 700 owners have better or similar outcomes (see tang description).

Specs:

• 700 medium w/#5 Benchmark, Spartan adapter, M5 bottom metal inlet, 2 flush cups

What barrel inlet?

 

[Gstew1930]

I’ve got a hunt at the end of October I need my manners for. I plan on selling after the hunt & ordering one of these if they are for sale by then

 

[bigsky_hunter]

Thank you!

12/22 order, single color

You pay for just single color? Looks like 3 colors to me. If that’s the case I might have to rethink my color scheme.

 

[BradArnett]

Considering the absence of 700 input, here's a quick summary of my 700 medium RokStok. Am curious whether other 700 owners have better or similar outcomes (see tang description).

Specs:

• 700 medium w/#5 Benchmark, Spartan adapter, M5 bottom metal inlet, 2 flush cups
• Ordered 12/21, arrived 8/31

Observations:

• I like the stock more than expected! Will buy another in 700 SA once the production issues and bugs are worked out.
• Low ring height better than medium (in my case).
• Stock is lightweight/lighter than expected.
• Definitely NOT a drop-in. I'll have to do some relief work, add pillars, and glass-bed the receiver to level out the receiver teetering forward and keeping the ejection port cut aligned.
• Barrel channel and bolt inlets are nicely done.
• The M5 inlet is TIGHT! I hammered it in with a rubber masonry mallet.
• Receiver tang area is goofy/weird, but fixable.
• Don't expect Manners or McMillan fit/finish if not painted.

Pics - stock with barrel action
View attachment 759400

Barrel inlet - pleased, no issues
View attachment 759401


Tang - inletting stops 1/8" too short, tang is longer than inlet
View attachment 759403

Inlet for tang is odd/unusually steep and deep, will require extending tang area shape and bedding the entire action
View attachment 759405


M5 bottom metal reveal - bottom of metal extends 1/8" around actions screw holes, end to end
View attachment 759404

My sa 700 stock did not look/fit like that at all. I pulled a rifle and m5 bottom metal from a mcm a5 and bolted it in the rokstok. Shot some groups and that rifle shot the same as it did in the bedded mcmillan.