Well I guess then there isnt much to hold them to. If it doesn't say how they have to do it then its hard to say they violated anything
That’s not necessarily true at all. Most of the laws in this country aren’t written for the government to tell the people what they can and can’t do. They’re written to tell the government what the people say the government can and can’t do.
The wildlife is held in trust by the state government for residents of the state. Depending on state law, they (FWP) may have violated state law by doing something that FWP doesn’t have specific approved statutory authority to do.
FWP sold preference points as giving the highest order of preference to those with the highest number of points.
FWP sold party application as an average of the party’s collective points. No one in the party has their own points once the draw begins, they all have the whatever the collective average is.
FWP kept 20% of the proceeds from released tags.
Finally, FWP awarded released tags to individuals who collectively had less preference points than others before they gave anyone the chance to agree to the new terms. I think there’s a judge in Montana that would at least hear this argument.
Edit: FWIW, I drew a tag with 2 points in the first go before the released tags and my friends drew with an average of 2.5. I’m not harping on this because I didn’t draw and I think I’m entitled to a tag. I’m upset that one of the greatest public resources in the world is this mismanaged. I’m frustrated that American tax payers, specifically sportsmen, foot the bill for this mismanagement. And I’m extremely disheartened that American citizens are ok with saying “well the government does what it does” and “just be happy with what you’ve got.” That’s not how we got to the point of abundant wildlife and hunting opportunity in this country and it’s damn sure not how we’re going to ensure it’s here for our children and children’s children to enjoy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk