Montana joint resolution to transfer federal public land

It sounds like the national chapter is problematic!!
No they are not. Radical right-wing pundits are always trying to make organizations like BHA look bad so they can get their grubby little hands on public lands. They dissed the Wildlife Federation also. They did the same thing with Ducks Unlimited and Delta Waterfowl who were pushing for CRP around the wetlands. They wanted to end the CRP program because the land they wanted to buy for extraction/development was off limits for 15 years under CRP contracts. But, take a long trip to the other end of the political spectrum and you will find radical left-wing nuts who are pushing “The Buffalo Commons” movement. It seems too “kooky” to ever happen but millions of acres in some states are already in their possession.

The Buffalo Commons is a movement to create a vast nature preserve by returning 140,000 square miles of the Great Plains to native prairie, and by reintroducing the bison ("buffalo") wolves and grizzlies, that once roamed the shortgrass and long grass prairies. The movement’s goal is to acquire contiguous parcels of land in ten states: Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas. Montana has a good example of what is going. The following is from FOX news in 2022.

“The American Prairie (AP), a conservation project in Montana, has quietly scooped up more than 450,000 acres of land with the help of its billionaire donors and the federal government.

The little-known project aims to create the largest "fully functioning ecosystem" in the continental U.S. by stitching together about 3.2 million acres of private and public lands, according to the American Prairie Foundation, which founded the reserve more than 20 years ago. The group has recorded 34 transactions spanning roughly 453,188 acres of land throughout central Montana — much of which were once used for farming and grazing — since 2004 and continues to aggressively expand.

"Our mission is to assemble the largest complex of public and private lands devoted to wildlife in the lower 48," Pete Geddes, AP's vice president and chief external relations officer, told Fox News Digital in an interview. "For comparison, about 25% larger than Yellowstone."

 
No they are not. Radical right-wing pundits are always trying to make organizations like BHA look bad so they can get their grubby little hands on public lands. They dissed the Wildlife Federation also. They did the same thing with Ducks Unlimited and Delta Waterfowl who were pushing for CRP around the wetlands. They wanted to end the CRP program because the land they wanted to buy for extraction/development was off limits for 15 years under CRP contracts. But, take a long trip to the other end of the political spectrum and you will find radical left-wing nuts who are pushing “The Buffalo Commons” movement. It seems too “kooky” to ever happen but millions of acres in some states are already in their possession.

The Buffalo Commons is a movement to create a vast nature preserve by returning 140,000 square miles of the Great Plains to native prairie, and by reintroducing the bison ("buffalo") wolves and grizzlies, that once roamed the shortgrass and long grass prairies. The movement’s goal is to acquire contiguous parcels of land in ten states: Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas. Montana has a good example of what is going. The following is from FOX news in 2022.

“The American Prairie (AP), a conservation project in Montana, has quietly scooped up more than 450,000 acres of land with the help of its billionaire donors and the federal government.

The little-known project aims to create the largest "fully functioning ecosystem" in the continental U.S. by stitching together about 3.2 million acres of private and public lands, according to the American Prairie Foundation, which founded the reserve more than 20 years ago. The group has recorded 34 transactions spanning roughly 453,188 acres of land throughout central Montana — much of which were once used for farming and grazing — since 2004 and continues to aggressively expand.

"Our mission is to assemble the largest complex of public and private lands devoted to wildlife in the lower 48," Pete Geddes, AP's vice president and chief external relations officer, told Fox News Digital in an interview. "For comparison, about 25% larger than Yellowstone."

You know I want to see Bison back on the landscape in large contiguous herds. I know it’s an unpopular opinion particularly among cattle ranchers. At the very least APR does have some transparency surrounding hunting on their properties and is not just a Ted Turner type of ranch where you pay to play. There are type 1 and type 2 opportunities that are available for the average every day hunter and I believe in that personally. Does that mean I’d rather have it in their hands than in the public’s? Absolutely not. Would I be okay with them having bison on public if it had to be through livestock designation status, absolutely.

 
Solar and wind have huge impacts on the landscape, that is not even an argument anymore. No need to rehash an established fact.

The push towards green energy and the propaganda behind it are despicable also.

With our own tax dollars we have been fed total lies from a subsidized media and education system to believe this way of energy is sustainable and is a feasible answer to environmental issues with power. Which anyone with common sense can immediately see the huge plot holes in that. Not to mention the entire cart before horse rollout of wind and solar in regards to storage and transportation.

It truly was a monumental grift to simply put money into the pockets of different shareholders. That’s all

National BHA is primarily funded by the same subsidized environmental organizations that peddled this lie. This is also well established and noted throughout many different posts on here and other media. They are at the national level a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

I’ll save you the retort about being a big fan of oil and lng or some bs about not caring about the environment. They also have massive impacts on everything and all options should be on the table to find the least impactful and most efficient way to power the world that lives in reality. IMO that answer is most likely nuclear.
This type of propaganda is what divides us and cancels our collective voices. Everyone has an opinion but this type of demonization targeting the very organizations that have our six is wrong!
 
Back
Top